RE: Neutral shipping losses
Posted by:
Visje
()
Date: March 27, 2001 06:11AM
<HTML>I know that it was strictly forbidden to attack Portugese shipping, don\'t know about Spanish, but it would seem logical. Franco was more or less Hitler\'s ally. Most of the Dutch ships sunk or damaged were tankers, and they were torpedoed in accordance with the order to sink tankers. There were however a few cases where the Dutch ships were not enroute to a British or French port. A few examples are Ameland and Burgerdijk. If AN and BF were \'sink-on-sight\' zones, it would explain these losses.</HTML>
Subject | Written By | Posted |
---|---|---|
Neutral shipping losses | Visje | 03/25/2001 12:45PM |
RE: Neutral shipping losses | Ken Dunn | 03/25/2001 02:43PM |
RE: Neutral shipping losses | Visje | 03/25/2001 04:26PM |
RE: Neutral shipping losses | Ken Dunn | 03/25/2001 10:53PM |
RE: Neutral shipping losses | Visje | 03/27/2001 08:02AM |
RE: Neutral shipping losses | Rainer Kolbicz | 03/26/2001 07:45PM |
RE: Neutral shipping losses | kpp | 03/26/2001 09:46PM |
RE: Neutral shipping losses | Roy Prince | 03/26/2001 11:44PM |
RE: Neutral shipping losses | Visje | 03/27/2001 06:11AM |
RE: Neutral shipping losses | Rainer Kolbicz | 03/27/2001 09:45AM |
RE: Neutral shipping losses | Rainer Kolbicz | 03/27/2001 10:06AM |
RE: Neutral shipping losses | Jan-Olof | 03/27/2001 04:24PM |
RE: Neutral shipping losses | Antonio Veiga | 03/25/2001 07:10PM |