RE: US Battleship vs. U-boat?
Posted by:
Simon
()
Date: May 01, 2001 03:40PM
<HTML>Hi Frank!
The USS Texas didn´t fire on U 203, because the war between the USA and Germany started in the December of 1941, a few days after Pearl Harbour. (Well, if you ignore the fact that american battleships escorted britisch steamers months before the REAL fighting...)
Maybe the crew of the Texas didn´t saw the submarine? Maybe they didn´t sail very fast?`There are lots of reasons why Mützelburg could hunt the battleship for 16 hours.</HTML>
The USS Texas didn´t fire on U 203, because the war between the USA and Germany started in the December of 1941, a few days after Pearl Harbour. (Well, if you ignore the fact that american battleships escorted britisch steamers months before the REAL fighting...)
Maybe the crew of the Texas didn´t saw the submarine? Maybe they didn´t sail very fast?`There are lots of reasons why Mützelburg could hunt the battleship for 16 hours.</HTML>
| Subject | Written By | Posted |
|---|---|---|
US Battleship vs. U-boat?
|
Frank Blazich | 04/30/2001 02:51AM |
|
RE: US Battleship vs. U-boat?
|
Yngvi | 04/30/2001 02:19PM |
|
RE: US Battleship vs. U-boat?
|
Frank Blazich | 05/01/2001 03:51AM |
|
RE: US Battleship vs. U-boat?
|
Simon | 05/01/2001 03:40PM |
|
RE: US Battleship vs. U-boat?
|
kurt | 05/01/2001 06:56PM |
|
RE: US Battleship vs. U-boat?
|
Brian Corijn | 05/01/2001 09:07PM |
|
RE: US Battleship vs. U-boat?
|
Yngvi | 05/01/2001 11:32PM |
|
RE: US Battleship vs. U-boat?
|
Frank Blazich | 05/02/2001 02:40AM |
|
RE: US Battleship vs. U-boat?
|
Brian Corijn | 05/02/2001 03:59AM |