RE: Rohwer part three
Posted by:
Ted Agar
()
Date: June 29, 2001 09:37PM
<HTML>Evening Rainer & Crew,
I am inclined to agree with you having plotted the sinkingpossitions on the chart it appears HX47 is the only solution as HX48 is not in the ballgame even if it was making good progress at above average knots.
Regards Ted.</HTML>
I am inclined to agree with you having plotted the sinkingpossitions on the chart it appears HX47 is the only solution as HX48 is not in the ballgame even if it was making good progress at above average knots.
Regards Ted.</HTML>
| Subject | Written By | Posted |
|---|---|---|
Rohwer part three
|
Jan-Olof | 06/28/2001 04:30AM |
|
RE: Rohwer part three
|
Josef Pijacek | 06/28/2001 06:22AM |
|
RE: Rohwer part three
|
Ted Agar | 06/28/2001 10:08PM |
|
RE: Rohwer part three
|
Siri | 06/28/2001 11:42PM |
|
RE: Rohwer part three
|
Rainer Kolbicz | 06/29/2001 06:46PM |
|
RE: Rohwer part three
|
Ted Agar | 06/29/2001 09:37PM |