General Discussions
This is the place to discuss general issues related to the U-boat war or the war at sea in WWII.
U 585 damage and loss
Posted by:
Brian V.
()
Date: October 27, 2009 04:06AM
HI all,
there is something wrong about the sequence of events leading to the sinking of U 585:
According to all sources I have consulted, on 24 March, 1942 U-585 was attacked by 3 enemy ships with depth charges, and was forced to return to base (Kirkenes) due to the resulting extensive damage.
Yet, she sailed for another patrol on 27/3 and was mined and sunk 30/3 off Kola Inlet.
My question, therefore, is how could the extensive damage have been repaired so quickly within 72 hours? Does anyone have additional info on the nature of the damage sustained or is there some mix-up with another boat?
Thanks, regards,
Brian
Tuez les tous, Dieu reconnaitra les siens.
Arnauld Amalric, Béziers, 1209 AD.
there is something wrong about the sequence of events leading to the sinking of U 585:
According to all sources I have consulted, on 24 March, 1942 U-585 was attacked by 3 enemy ships with depth charges, and was forced to return to base (Kirkenes) due to the resulting extensive damage.
Yet, she sailed for another patrol on 27/3 and was mined and sunk 30/3 off Kola Inlet.
My question, therefore, is how could the extensive damage have been repaired so quickly within 72 hours? Does anyone have additional info on the nature of the damage sustained or is there some mix-up with another boat?
Thanks, regards,
Brian
Tuez les tous, Dieu reconnaitra les siens.
Arnauld Amalric, Béziers, 1209 AD.
Subject | Written By | Posted |
---|---|---|
U 585 damage and loss | Brian V. | 10/27/2009 04:06AM |
Re: U 585 damage and loss | Brian V. | 10/28/2009 04:57AM |
Re: U 585 damage and loss | Walter Schmidt | 10/29/2009 03:31AM |
Re: U 585 damage and loss | Rainer | 10/30/2009 09:46AM |
Re: U 585 damage and loss | Walter Schmidt | 10/31/2009 03:24PM |