Technology and Operations
This forum is for discussing technological & operational matters pertaining to U-boats.
Re: RE: Metox?....Biscay Cross??
Posted by:
David
()
Date: February 15, 2009 09:30PM
Anonymous User Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> It's been long debated as to whether or not the
> Beligerents were homing in on each other's
> receiver emissions or not, but it is technically
> feasable.
And that truth is exactly why the story would appear to be credible. If it hadn't been plausible, it would have been dismissed immediately. Instead, it both diverted attention from centimetric radar AND started a large effort to build a Metox replacement.
-------------------------------------------------------
> It's been long debated as to whether or not the
> Beligerents were homing in on each other's
> receiver emissions or not, but it is technically
> feasable.
And that truth is exactly why the story would appear to be credible. If it hadn't been plausible, it would have been dismissed immediately. Instead, it both diverted attention from centimetric radar AND started a large effort to build a Metox replacement.
Subject | Written By | Posted |
---|---|---|
Metox?....Biscay Cross?? | T.Clark | 10/28/2000 11:47PM |
RE: Metox?....Biscay Cross?? | joe brandt | 10/29/2000 02:24AM |
RE: Metox?....Biscay Cross?? | Enrique | 10/29/2000 02:30PM |
RE: Metox?....Biscay Cross?? | John | 10/30/2000 05:02AM |
RE: Metox?....Biscay Cross?? | John R. | 10/30/2000 01:11PM |
Re: RE: Metox?....Biscay Cross?? | Joseph Romero Kc5mip | 01/24/2008 12:47PM |
Re: RE: Metox?....Biscay Cross?? | David | 02/15/2009 09:30PM |
Re: RE: Metox?....Biscay Cross?? | ThomasHorton | 02/17/2009 05:23PM |
Re: RE: Metox?....Biscay Cross?? | Robert Langille | 03/30/2010 06:57PM |
Re: RE: Metox?....Biscay Cross?? | rhokane | 07/06/2010 10:44PM |