RE: radios
Posted by: JohnR. ()
Date: November 29, 2000 01:43PM

What the receivers lacked in selectivity, they more than made up for in sensitivity, didn\'t they? they were TRF w/ regen detectors, like a US Navy RAL, weren\'t they?
Roy, I know Spark had pretty much rasped it\'s last among US Hams by the mid-20\'s, but didn\'t it survive on the high-seas above 600M till almost the outbreak of the War?

73,
John WB9OFG



Subject Written By Posted
radios ron 11/17/2000 04:41AM
RE: radios John R. 11/22/2000 05:40PM
RE: radios Roy Prince 11/23/2000 01:30AM
RE: radios Leif... 11/23/2000 07:51AM
RE: radios Roy Prince 11/27/2000 03:04AM
Ok, thanks. (NT) Leif... 11/27/2000 10:38AM
RE: radios John R. 11/27/2000 10:04PM
RE: radios Roy Prince 11/28/2000 01:01AM
RE: radios JohnR. 11/29/2000 01:43PM
RE: radios Roy Prince 11/30/2000 12:27AM
RE: radios Ted Agar 11/24/2000 07:32PM
RE: radios John R. 11/28/2000 04:51PM
RE: radios Roy Prince 11/29/2000 12:22AM
RE: radio Transmitter \"Kurier\" Ton den Boer 11/28/2000 08:10PM
RE: radio Transmitter \\\"Kurier\\\" John R. 11/29/2000 01:39PM
RE: radio Transmitter \\\\\\\"Kurier\\\\\\\&q Ton den Boer 11/30/2000 07:40PM