RE: radios
Posted by:
JohnR.
()
Date: November 29, 2000 01:43PM
What the receivers lacked in selectivity, they more than made up for in sensitivity, didn\'t they? they were TRF w/ regen detectors, like a US Navy RAL, weren\'t they?
Roy, I know Spark had pretty much rasped it\'s last among US Hams by the mid-20\'s, but didn\'t it survive on the high-seas above 600M till almost the outbreak of the War?
73,
John WB9OFG
Roy, I know Spark had pretty much rasped it\'s last among US Hams by the mid-20\'s, but didn\'t it survive on the high-seas above 600M till almost the outbreak of the War?
73,
John WB9OFG
Subject | Written By | Posted |
---|---|---|
radios | ron | 11/17/2000 04:41AM |
RE: radios | John R. | 11/22/2000 05:40PM |
RE: radios | Roy Prince | 11/23/2000 01:30AM |
RE: radios | Leif... | 11/23/2000 07:51AM |
RE: radios | Roy Prince | 11/27/2000 03:04AM |
Ok, thanks. (NT) | Leif... | 11/27/2000 10:38AM |
RE: radios | John R. | 11/27/2000 10:04PM |
RE: radios | Roy Prince | 11/28/2000 01:01AM |
RE: radios | JohnR. | 11/29/2000 01:43PM |
RE: radios | Roy Prince | 11/30/2000 12:27AM |
RE: radios | Ted Agar | 11/24/2000 07:32PM |
RE: radios | John R. | 11/28/2000 04:51PM |
RE: radios | Roy Prince | 11/29/2000 12:22AM |
RE: radio Transmitter \"Kurier\" | Ton den Boer | 11/28/2000 08:10PM |
RE: radio Transmitter \\\"Kurier\\\" | John R. | 11/29/2000 01:39PM |
RE: radio Transmitter \\\\\\\"Kurier\\\\\\\&q | Ton den Boer | 11/30/2000 07:40PM |