WWI forum
World War One discussions.
Re: New loss information: UB 103 and UB 119
Posted by:
SJH
()
Date: August 10, 2003 09:50AM
<HTML>Hi, Michael,
I have a question about the timing of UB-103's sinking. If Grant suggests that UB-103 was depth charged on August 14th 1918, how does that tie in with her sinking of the "Kendall Castle" on 15th Sept 1918. Although the "Kendall Castle" was credited to UB-103, was it in fact sunk by Hundius, or could it have been some other boat. The date of UB-103's supposed sinking on 16th Sept tied in perfectly with the sinking of the "Kendall Castle" the previous day. What are your thoughts?</HTML>
I have a question about the timing of UB-103's sinking. If Grant suggests that UB-103 was depth charged on August 14th 1918, how does that tie in with her sinking of the "Kendall Castle" on 15th Sept 1918. Although the "Kendall Castle" was credited to UB-103, was it in fact sunk by Hundius, or could it have been some other boat. The date of UB-103's supposed sinking on 16th Sept tied in perfectly with the sinking of the "Kendall Castle" the previous day. What are your thoughts?</HTML>
Subject | Written By | Posted |
---|---|---|
New loss information: UB 103 and UB 119 | Michael Lowrey | 07/13/2003 11:20PM |
Re: New loss information: UB 103 and UB 119 | SJH | 08/10/2003 09:38AM |
Re: New loss information: UB 103 and UB 119 | SJH | 08/10/2003 09:50AM |
Re: New loss information: UB 103 and UB 119 | Michael Lowrey | 08/10/2003 02:56PM |