Re: SMU-37
Posted by:
Yves D
()
Date: July 29, 2003 08:13PM
<HTML>Thank you John for your appreciated contribution.
However, the date at which each boat was really fitted remains a subject of controversy and the very final answer is more likely in the flotilla's KTB, what I have not, unfortunately.
VBR
Yves</HTML>
However, the date at which each boat was really fitted remains a subject of controversy and the very final answer is more likely in the flotilla's KTB, what I have not, unfortunately.
VBR
Yves</HTML>
| Subject | Written By | Posted |
|---|---|---|
SMU-37
|
Yves D | 07/28/2003 08:56PM |
|
Re: SMU-37
|
Brian | 07/29/2003 01:55AM |
|
Re: SMU-37, additional
|
Brian | 07/29/2003 01:59AM |
|
Re: SMU-37, addenda
|
Yves D | 07/29/2003 04:48AM |
|
Re: SMU-37, additional
|
Yves D | 07/29/2003 04:33AM |
|
Re: SMU-37
|
john | 07/29/2003 04:17PM |
|
Re: SMU-37
|
Yves D | 07/29/2003 08:13PM |