Re: U-26
Posted by:
Michael Lowrey
()
Date: September 04, 2003 11:20PM
<HTML>Dänemark,
I have Minesweeper No.1 as sunk on September 16 (or 17), 1915. Also, for her tonnage, Bendert lists 792, Conways's 450.
As for why PETCHORA isn't in Lloyd's, she was a Russian naval vessel, designed and built as a troop transport, and never was in merchantile service. Her displacement tonnage (full load) was 1982, which translates to about 1310 grt.
Best wishes,
Michael</HTML>
I have Minesweeper No.1 as sunk on September 16 (or 17), 1915. Also, for her tonnage, Bendert lists 792, Conways's 450.
As for why PETCHORA isn't in Lloyd's, she was a Russian naval vessel, designed and built as a troop transport, and never was in merchantile service. Her displacement tonnage (full load) was 1982, which translates to about 1310 grt.
Best wishes,
Michael</HTML>
| Subject | Written By | Posted |
|---|---|---|
U-26
|
JEAN-MICHEL | 09/02/2003 04:49AM |
|
Re: U-26
|
Simon | 09/02/2003 01:12PM |
|
Re: U-26
|
Dänemark | 09/02/2003 01:44PM |
|
Re: U-26
|
Simon | 09/02/2003 04:09PM |
|
Re: U-26
|
Dänemark | 09/02/2003 04:38PM |
|
Re: U-26
|
Simon | 09/02/2003 04:57PM |
|
Re: U-26
|
JEAN-MICHEL | 09/03/2003 04:48AM |
|
Re: U-26
|
JEAN-MICHEL | 09/04/2003 05:07AM |
|
Re: U-26
|
Michael Lowrey | 09/04/2003 11:20PM |
|
Re: U-26
|
JEAN-MICHEL | 09/05/2003 05:14AM |
|
Re: U-26
|
Simon | 09/05/2003 03:16PM |
|
Re: U-26
|
JEAN-MICHEL | 09/08/2003 05:43AM |
|
Re: U-26
|
Yuri IL'IN | 09/16/2003 02:45PM |
|
Re: U-26
|
Simon | 09/17/2003 03:59AM |