Re: U-26
Posted by:
JEAN-MICHEL
()
Date: September 05, 2003 05:14AM
<HTML>thank you for these precisions MICHAEL
brgds
JEAN-MICHELMichael Lowrey wrote:
>
> Dänemark,
>
> I have Minesweeper No.1 as sunk on September 16 (or 17),
> 1915. Also, for her tonnage, Bendert lists 792, Conways's 450.
>
> As for why PETCHORA isn't in Lloyd's, she was a Russian naval
> vessel, designed and built as a troop transport, and never
> was in merchantile service. Her displacement tonnage (full
> load) was 1982, which translates to about 1310 grt.
>
> Best wishes,
>
> Michael</HTML>
brgds
JEAN-MICHELMichael Lowrey wrote:
>
> Dänemark,
>
> I have Minesweeper No.1 as sunk on September 16 (or 17),
> 1915. Also, for her tonnage, Bendert lists 792, Conways's 450.
>
> As for why PETCHORA isn't in Lloyd's, she was a Russian naval
> vessel, designed and built as a troop transport, and never
> was in merchantile service. Her displacement tonnage (full
> load) was 1982, which translates to about 1310 grt.
>
> Best wishes,
>
> Michael</HTML>
| Subject | Written By | Posted |
|---|---|---|
U-26
|
JEAN-MICHEL | 09/02/2003 04:49AM |
|
Re: U-26
|
Simon | 09/02/2003 01:12PM |
|
Re: U-26
|
Dänemark | 09/02/2003 01:44PM |
|
Re: U-26
|
Simon | 09/02/2003 04:09PM |
|
Re: U-26
|
Dänemark | 09/02/2003 04:38PM |
|
Re: U-26
|
Simon | 09/02/2003 04:57PM |
|
Re: U-26
|
JEAN-MICHEL | 09/03/2003 04:48AM |
|
Re: U-26
|
JEAN-MICHEL | 09/04/2003 05:07AM |
|
Re: U-26
|
Michael Lowrey | 09/04/2003 11:20PM |
|
Re: U-26
|
JEAN-MICHEL | 09/05/2003 05:14AM |
|
Re: U-26
|
Simon | 09/05/2003 03:16PM |
|
Re: U-26
|
JEAN-MICHEL | 09/08/2003 05:43AM |
|
Re: U-26
|
Yuri IL'IN | 09/16/2003 02:45PM |
|
Re: U-26
|
Simon | 09/17/2003 03:59AM |