WWI forum  
World War One discussions. 
Go to: Forum List•Message List•New Topic•Search•Log In•Print View
Re: UB-35 confusion
Posted by: Jan-Olof ()
Date: July 21, 2004 04:32PM

Hello Dänemark,

I see your point but I have to admit I find the phrasing a bit odd. Compare for example with what is written about UB74:

"Sunk by depth charges from patrol yacht Lorna in Lyme Bay at 5032N 0232W. 35 dead (all hands lost)"

There were 4 men in the water after the sub had been DC'ed by Lorna, three of those were killed when another DC was dropped, the fourth was brought aboard alive but died shortly afterwards. Shouldn't we have four survivors in this case?

Regards Jan-Olof

Options: Reply•Quote


Subject Written By Posted
UB-35 confusion Jan-Olof 07/19/2004 04:19PM
Re: UB-35 confusion Dänemark 07/19/2004 07:05PM
Re: UB-35 confusion Jan-Olof 07/21/2004 04:32PM
Re: UB-35 confusion Dänemark 07/21/2004 06:42PM
Re: UB-35 confusion Bruce 07/22/2004 02:18AM
Re: UB-35 confusion Michael Lowrey 07/25/2004 12:49PM
Re: UB-35 confusion Jan-Olof 07/25/2004 04:52PM
Re: UB-35 confusion Michael Lowrey 07/25/2004 05:08PM


Go to: Forum List•Message List•Search•Log In
Your Name: 
Your Email: 
Subject: 
Spam prevention:
Please, enter the code that you see below in the input field. This is for blocking bots that try to post this form automatically.
 **      **  **     **  ********   **     **  **    ** 
 **  **  **   **   **   **     **  **     **   **  **  
 **  **  **    ** **    **     **  **     **    ****   
 **  **  **     ***     **     **  **     **     **    
 **  **  **    ** **    **     **   **   **      **    
 **  **  **   **   **   **     **    ** **       **    
  ***  ***   **     **  ********      ***        **