WWI forum  
World War One discussions. 
Re: UB-35 confusion
Posted by: Bruce ()
Date: July 22, 2004 02:18AM

I agree. By definition, a survivor is someone who lives through the event. It could get complicated if one is "rescued" by another boat or ship and than that unit is sunk a day or three later and the original survivor is than lost. I think the note on UB-35 should say "no survivors". It is "jumping a war", but if the 6 men in the water who drowned are counted as survivors because they got off the boat, that in the many cases in WWII where planes sank boats and saw men in the water but the men were never picked up, these men should be listed as "survivors". Which is not realistic.

Thats just my opinion,

Bruce

Options: ReplyQuote


Subject Written By Posted
UB-35 confusion Jan-Olof 07/19/2004 04:19PM
Re: UB-35 confusion Dänemark 07/19/2004 07:05PM
Re: UB-35 confusion Jan-Olof 07/21/2004 04:32PM
Re: UB-35 confusion Dänemark 07/21/2004 06:42PM
Re: UB-35 confusion Bruce 07/22/2004 02:18AM
Re: UB-35 confusion Michael Lowrey 07/25/2004 12:49PM
Re: UB-35 confusion Jan-Olof 07/25/2004 04:52PM
Re: UB-35 confusion Michael Lowrey 07/25/2004 05:08PM


Your Name: 
Your Email: 
Subject: 
Spam prevention:
Please, enter the code that you see below in the input field. This is for blocking bots that try to post this form automatically.
  *******   **    **  ********  **     **  **    ** 
 **     **  **   **   **    **  **     **  **   **  
 **         **  **        **    **     **  **  **   
 ********   *****        **     **     **  *****    
 **     **  **  **      **      **     **  **  **   
 **     **  **   **     **      **     **  **   **  
  *******   **    **    **       *******   **    **