WWI forum  
World War One discussions. 
Go to: Forum List•Message List•New Topic•Search•Log In•Print View
Re: S.S. California
Posted by: Michael Lowrey ()
Date: July 22, 2004 09:57PM

Eric,

I would presume it is the same CALIFORNIAN. Tennent notes that teh one lost in 1915 was from the Leyland line, built in 1902, and had never been renamed.

The WWI ships sunk/damaged/captured database (and that is what it is -- if it was merely attacked, it's not in there) was originally not designed to include such details. The focus was solely on deternmining which U-boat sank which ship. We'll add in more details as we have time, but it will be a slow process.

Best wishes.

Michael

Options: Reply•Quote


Subject Written By Posted
S.S. California Rene 07/22/2004 06:38PM
Re: S.S. California Dänemark 07/22/2004 07:21PM
Re: S.S. California Eric 07/22/2004 07:59PM
Re: S.S. California Rene 07/22/2004 08:17PM
Re: S.S. California Michael Lowrey 07/22/2004 09:57PM
Re: S.S. California Eric 07/23/2004 01:51AM
Re: S.S. California Michael Lowrey 07/23/2004 08:32AM
Re: S.S. California Dänemark 07/22/2004 10:02PM
Re: S.S. Californian Dänemark 07/22/2004 10:04PM
Re: S.S. Californian Simon 07/24/2004 11:31AM


Go to: Forum List•Message List•Search•Log In
Your Name: 
Your Email: 
Subject: 
Spam prevention:
Please, enter the code that you see below in the input field. This is for blocking bots that try to post this form automatically.
 **     **  **         **     **        **  ********  
 **     **  **    **    **   **         **  **     ** 
 **     **  **    **     ** **          **  **     ** 
 **     **  **    **      ***           **  ********  
 **     **  *********    ** **    **    **  **     ** 
 **     **        **    **   **   **    **  **     ** 
  *******         **   **     **   ******   ********