WWI forum
World War One discussions.
Re: U 86 - Trawler G.Y. 568
Posted by:
Josephbremez
()
Date: July 26, 2009 03:26PM
Hi Debbie and welcome to the forum,
We have two facts concerning the disappearance of the Queenborough. She sailed on
or about 21 March '17. U86 sank a British trawler on 23 March 1917.
KptLt Crusemann saw the port number of the trawlers he sank. When recalling the
incident in his kriegstagebuch (war diary), he wrote or typed GY568. GY568 is the
Valentia which was NOT sunk and survived the war. The only logical conclusion is
that Crusemann transposed the numbers. GY658 is the trawler he sunk and GY658 is
the Queenborough. Other combinations of the number 6,5and 8 e.g. 586, 685, 856
and 865 reveal no missing or unaccounted for trawlers.
I don't have a copy of U86's KTB. Perhaps Simon or some other esteemed member of
the forum can help with these questions. Was the trawler armed? Did Queenborough
resist? Where and at what time did the action take place?
Hope this explaination helps.
Sincerely
Joe R
We have two facts concerning the disappearance of the Queenborough. She sailed on
or about 21 March '17. U86 sank a British trawler on 23 March 1917.
KptLt Crusemann saw the port number of the trawlers he sank. When recalling the
incident in his kriegstagebuch (war diary), he wrote or typed GY568. GY568 is the
Valentia which was NOT sunk and survived the war. The only logical conclusion is
that Crusemann transposed the numbers. GY658 is the trawler he sunk and GY658 is
the Queenborough. Other combinations of the number 6,5and 8 e.g. 586, 685, 856
and 865 reveal no missing or unaccounted for trawlers.
I don't have a copy of U86's KTB. Perhaps Simon or some other esteemed member of
the forum can help with these questions. Was the trawler armed? Did Queenborough
resist? Where and at what time did the action take place?
Hope this explaination helps.
Sincerely
Joe R