WWI forum
World War One discussions.
Re: UB 64 (and Justicia) rears her head again
Posted by:
Clio
()
Date: December 31, 2010 10:54PM
I used the log book of Marne and the various reports in ADM 137/2620, including those of Rear Admiral Miller SNO Buncrana and the convoy commodore - which are quite contradictory. Admiral Miller's report to Admiralty seems to have formed the basis of everything that has been written about the Justicia affair. I have been attempting to reconcile the information with firing times given in Spindler. I think credit for the killer torpedo strike must go to UB 164 as judging from the firing times there is no evidence that any of U 54's torpedoes hit Justicia.
I was also trying to ascertain whether UB 64 suffered much damage in the attack on 19.7 as Portia's look-outs spotted what they took to be a significant oil slick
I was also trying to ascertain whether UB 64 suffered much damage in the attack on 19.7 as Portia's look-outs spotted what they took to be a significant oil slick
Subject | Written By | Posted |
---|---|---|
UB 64 (and Justicia) rears her head again | Clio | 12/29/2010 07:54PM |
Re: UB 64 (and Justicia) rears her head again | Yves D | 12/31/2010 02:19PM |
Re: UB 64 (and Justicia) rears her head again | Oliver Lörscher | 12/31/2010 03:30PM |
Re: UB 64 (and Justicia) rears her head again | Clio | 12/31/2010 10:54PM |
Re: UB 64 (and Justicia) rears her head again | Clio | 12/31/2010 10:57PM |
Re: UB 64 (and Justicia) rears her head again | Josephbremez | 01/01/2011 05:09PM |
Re: UB 64 (and Justicia) rears her head again | Oliver Lörscher | 01/01/2011 06:40PM |
Re: UB 64 (and Justicia) rears her head again | Clio | 01/01/2011 10:21PM |