Movies and Films  
This is the forum for Movie and Film discussions. Again, our topic is naval warfare in WWII for the most part. 
Pearl harbour is purely hollywood
Posted by: Kris ()
Date: June 01, 2001 12:04PM

<HTML>Thats my take on it. Its all Ben Afleck and Kate Beckinsdale and not the war. If you removed the context of the war and put Gilligans Island in the back, it still won\'t make a difference. There is some computer generated battle sequences(maybe not but it seems all so plastic to me) but all in all its bullshine. Just goes to prove that it does take a Steven Spielberg to get a good war movie out. Saving PR will be one of the classics of war in this decade. But Why? There were just ordinary directors that made some fantastic low budget war flicks back in the 50s and 60\'s. Why is it all hollywoodized now? Waste of money but it will still be the biggest grosser in the box office.

Kris </HTML>

Options: ReplyQuote


Subject Written By Posted
Pearl harbour is purely hollywood Kris 06/01/2001 12:04PM
U-571 was better Steve Cooper 06/03/2001 11:06PM
RE: \'Pearl Harbour\', errr, sorry \'Harbor\'! John Bull 06/04/2001 09:10AM
RE: \\\'Pearl Harbour\\\', errr, sorry \\\'Harbor\ Steve Cooper 06/04/2001 12:46PM
RE: Oh, the humanity of it! John Bull 06/12/2001 02:49PM
RE: Oh, the humanity of it! Don Baker 06/15/2001 02:25AM
RE: Oh, the humanity of it! Mark Carroll 06/24/2001 01:21AM
RE: U-571 was better Kris 06/04/2001 12:16PM


Your Name: 
Your Email: 
Subject: 
Spam prevention:
Please, enter the code that you see below in the input field. This is for blocking bots that try to post this form automatically.
 **    **   ******   **      **  ********  ******** 
 ***   **  **    **  **  **  **  **        **       
 ****  **  **        **  **  **  **        **       
 ** ** **  **        **  **  **  ******    ******   
 **  ****  **        **  **  **  **        **       
 **   ***  **    **  **  **  **  **        **       
 **    **   ******    ***  ***   **        ********