Movies and Films
This is the forum for Movie and Film discussions. Again, our topic is naval warfare in WWII for the most part.
Pearl harbour is purely hollywood
Posted by:
Kris
()
Date: June 01, 2001 12:04PM
<HTML>Thats my take on it. Its all Ben Afleck and Kate Beckinsdale and not the war. If you removed the context of the war and put Gilligans Island in the back, it still won\'t make a difference. There is some computer generated battle sequences(maybe not but it seems all so plastic to me) but all in all its bullshine. Just goes to prove that it does take a Steven Spielberg to get a good war movie out. Saving PR will be one of the classics of war in this decade. But Why? There were just ordinary directors that made some fantastic low budget war flicks back in the 50s and 60\'s. Why is it all hollywoodized now? Waste of money but it will still be the biggest grosser in the box office.
Kris </HTML>
Kris </HTML>
Subject | Written By | Posted |
---|---|---|
Pearl harbour is purely hollywood | Kris | 06/01/2001 12:04PM |
U-571 was better | Steve Cooper | 06/03/2001 11:06PM |
RE: \'Pearl Harbour\', errr, sorry \'Harbor\'! | John Bull | 06/04/2001 09:10AM |
RE: \\\'Pearl Harbour\\\', errr, sorry \\\'Harbor\ | Steve Cooper | 06/04/2001 12:46PM |
RE: Oh, the humanity of it! | John Bull | 06/12/2001 02:49PM |
RE: Oh, the humanity of it! | Don Baker | 06/15/2001 02:25AM |
RE: Oh, the humanity of it! | Mark Carroll | 06/24/2001 01:21AM |
RE: U-571 was better | Kris | 06/04/2001 12:16PM |