Technology and Operations
This forum is for discussing technological & operational matters pertaining to U-boats.
RE: Bathythermograph
Posted by:
kurt
()
Date: March 07, 2001 11:43PM
I also have never heard, and do not know, if a bathythermograph was on a U-boat.
Thermals in the North Atlantic tend to be deeper than the Pacific. They also vary by weather, currents and a lot of other factors. In the Pacific, sometimes it would be too deep to be used, sometimes at only 200 feet or even less. Often a US boat would go \'deep\' just before an attack to find the thermocline layer depth and plan evasion tactics accordingly. It was quite usefull.
In the Atlantic I read (where was that?..) that they typically were at or below 600 feet, below rated U-boat depth. Too deep to be tactifully useful.
Thermals in the North Atlantic tend to be deeper than the Pacific. They also vary by weather, currents and a lot of other factors. In the Pacific, sometimes it would be too deep to be used, sometimes at only 200 feet or even less. Often a US boat would go \'deep\' just before an attack to find the thermocline layer depth and plan evasion tactics accordingly. It was quite usefull.
In the Atlantic I read (where was that?..) that they typically were at or below 600 feet, below rated U-boat depth. Too deep to be tactifully useful.
Subject | Written By | Posted |
---|---|---|
Bathythermograph | Visje | 03/07/2001 01:17PM |
RE: Bathythermograph | Derek | 03/07/2001 05:49PM |
RE: Bathythermograph | Visje | 03/07/2001 06:39PM |
RE: Bathythermograph | Antonio Veiga | 03/07/2001 11:24PM |
RE: Bathythermograph | kurt | 03/07/2001 11:43PM |
RE: Bathythermograph | Visje | 03/08/2001 07:36AM |
RE: Bathythermograph | John Doe | 03/08/2001 08:18AM |
RE: Bathythermograph | Visje | 03/08/2001 05:42PM |
RE: Bathythermograph | David W | 03/09/2001 03:48AM |
Re: RE: Bathythermograph | Sbb | 07/22/2008 08:43AM |