Technology and Operations  
This forum is for discussing technological & operational matters pertaining to U-boats. 
Re: US Submarines vis-a-vis U-Boats--Tonnage Sunk by US Subs
Posted by: Forest ()
Date: December 13, 2005 02:43AM

"After the war the Joint Army-Navy Assessment Committee reviewed the Japanese records and determined that SHINANO was the largest ship sunk by a submarine. The Japanese listed her as 69,000 tons, and the committee confirmed her at 69,000
tons."

Sounds like a typo combined with confusion. The original credit was 28,000 tons for a "Hayatake-class" carrier, as Enright claimed at the time. This was revised upwards to 71,000 tons at the end of the war, then JANAC's postwar analysis changed it downwards to 59,000 tons (not 69,000), a believable figure just under the standard displacement of the ship if she'd actually been completed. Makes sense.

69,000 tons is clearly too high, as it exceeds the standard displacement she would have had if she'd been completed. Of course, she wasn't.

Many websites, including the one on which we are posting, confirm the 59,000-ton figure. For example:

[uboat.net]

In any case, they did not use full load displacement to assess warship sinkings in those days.

You have a nice day, too.

Forest

Options: ReplyQuote


Subject Written By Posted
US Submarines vis-a-vis U-Boats Robert Murphy 12/03/2005 09:18AM
Re: US Submarines vis-a-vis U-Boats J.T. McDaniel 12/03/2005 04:53PM
Re: US Submarines vis-a-vis U-Boats Robert Murphy 12/04/2005 03:52AM
Re: US Submarines vis-a-vis U-Boats danodenweller 12/04/2005 04:29AM
Re: US Submarines vis-a-vis U-Boats Robert Murphy 12/05/2005 06:21PM
Re: US Submarines vis-a-vis U-Boats kurt 12/05/2005 06:21PM
Re: US Submarines vis-a-vis U-Boats Mike Mamula 12/05/2005 06:49PM
Re: US Submarines vis-a-vis U-Boats kurt 12/05/2005 07:44PM
Re: US Submarines vis-a-vis U-Boats Forest 12/10/2005 03:02AM
Re: US Submarines vis-a-vis U-Boats Harold Moyers 12/05/2005 10:37PM
Re: US Submarines vis-a-vis U-Boats Forest 12/09/2005 04:55AM
Re: US Submarines vis-a-vis U-Boats--Tonnage Sunk by US Subs Robert Murphy 12/09/2005 10:00PM
Re: US Submarines vis-a-vis U-Boats--Tonnage Sunk by US Subs Forest 12/10/2005 03:00AM
Re: US Submarines vis-a-vis U-Boats--Tonnage Sunk by US Subs ROBERT M. 12/10/2005 06:27AM
Re: US Submarines vis-a-vis U-Boats--Tonnage Sunk by US Subs Forest 12/12/2005 03:20AM
"Standard Displacement?" Robert Murphy 12/12/2005 08:37AM
Re: "Standard Displacement?" kurt 12/12/2005 11:49PM
Re: "Standard Displacement?" Forest 12/13/2005 02:14AM
Re: "Standard Displacement?" Robert Murphy 12/13/2005 04:52AM
Re: US Submarines vis-a-vis U-Boats--Tonnage Sunk by US Subs ROBERT M. 12/12/2005 05:25PM
Re: US Submarines vis-a-vis U-Boats--Tonnage Sunk by US Subs Robert Murphy 12/12/2005 10:35PM
Re: US Submarines vis-a-vis U-Boats--Tonnage Sunk by US Subs Forest 12/13/2005 02:43AM
Re: US Submarines vis-a-vis U-Boats--Tonnage Sunk by US Subs ROBERT M. 12/13/2005 03:52PM
Re: US Submarines vis-a-vis U-Boats--Tonnage Sunk by US Subs kurt 12/13/2005 07:45PM
Re: US Submarines vis-a-vis U-Boats--Tonnage Sunk by US Subs Forest 12/13/2005 09:32PM
shinano stories kurt 12/13/2005 11:49PM
Re: shinano stories Forest 12/14/2005 01:21AM
Re: shinano stories ROBERT M. 12/14/2005 04:24AM
Re: US Submarines vis-a-vis U-Boats--Tonnage Sunk by US Subs ROBERT M. 12/10/2005 06:08AM
Re: US Submarines vis-a-vis U-Boats--Tonnage Sunk by US Subs Robert Murphy 12/11/2005 01:49AM
US subs tonnage sunk kurt 12/13/2005 07:58PM
Re: US subs tonnage sunk Robert Murphy 12/14/2005 07:08PM


Your Name: 
Your Email: 
Subject: 
Spam prevention:
Please, enter the code that you see below in the input field. This is for blocking bots that try to post this form automatically.
 ********   **     **  **     **  **     **        ** 
 **     **  **     **   **   **   **     **        ** 
 **     **  **     **    ** **    **     **        ** 
 **     **  **     **     ***     *********        ** 
 **     **   **   **     ** **    **     **  **    ** 
 **     **    ** **     **   **   **     **  **    ** 
 ********      ***     **     **  **     **   ******