Warship forum  
A forum for the Allied Warships section. 
Go to: Forum List•Message List•New Topic•Search•Log In•Print View
Re: HMSAS NATAL
Posted by: Brian ()
Date: September 15, 2003 02:06AM

<HTML>Actually it is a well established fact that the one ASW attack she carried out resulted in no damage to the sub. It was a "politically correct" expedient by the Admiralty to credit her with the sinking, but the boat was tracked for several hours after the attack & departure of Natal from the area.
This subject has been discussed earlier and that was the outcome.
Brian</HTML>

Options: Reply•Quote


Subject Written By Posted
HMSAS NATAL Patrick Mooney 09/08/2003 12:22AM
Re: HMSAS NATAL Peter 09/13/2003 07:57AM
Re: HMSAS NATAL Brian 09/15/2003 02:06AM
Re: HMSAS NATAL Peter 09/17/2003 06:29PM
Re: HMSAS NATAL Brian 09/18/2003 02:08AM
Re: HMSAS NATAL Peter 09/18/2003 07:01PM
Re: HMSAS NATAL FNE 09/30/2003 05:31PM
Re: HMSAS NATAL Pepin 10/01/2003 02:28AM
Re: HMSAS NATAL leading stoker ducthy glass martin langford 11/11/2007 04:36PM
Re: HMSAS NATAL martin langford 12/26/2007 09:51PM
Re: HMSAS NATAL Richmond Wilmot 05/10/2008 11:25AM


Go to: Forum List•Message List•Search•Log In
Your Name: 
Your Email: 
Subject: 
Spam prevention:
Please, enter the code that you see below in the input field. This is for blocking bots that try to post this form automatically.
  *******         **  ********   **         **     ** 
 **     **        **  **     **  **    **   ***   *** 
 **     **        **  **     **  **    **   **** **** 
  ********        **  ********   **    **   ** *** ** 
        **  **    **  **     **  *********  **     ** 
 **     **  **    **  **     **        **   **     ** 
  *******    ******   ********         **   **     **