Warship forum  
A forum for the Allied Warships section. 
Re: HMSAS NATAL
Posted by: Peter ()
Date: September 18, 2003 07:01PM

<HTML>Hi Brian

I am aware that that the sub was heard moving after the attack but the the reason for the investigation by RNHB was to, according to them, "finally put the matter to rest." I did not perceive your response as any sort of slander, rather part of a good healthy discussion. I will ask the person who completed the study for the info contained in the study. I think that the study was completed due to a request from the RN who were interested in giving credit where it was due. I only happened on the new findings whilst researching something completely different. Anyway I hope this thread has helped Patrick - took me a while to write it up for him!

Regards
PK</HTML>

Options: ReplyQuote


Subject Written By Posted
HMSAS NATAL Patrick Mooney 09/08/2003 12:22AM
Re: HMSAS NATAL Peter 09/13/2003 07:57AM
Re: HMSAS NATAL Brian 09/15/2003 02:06AM
Re: HMSAS NATAL Peter 09/17/2003 06:29PM
Re: HMSAS NATAL Brian 09/18/2003 02:08AM
Re: HMSAS NATAL Peter 09/18/2003 07:01PM
Re: HMSAS NATAL FNE 09/30/2003 05:31PM
Re: HMSAS NATAL Pepin 10/01/2003 02:28AM
Re: HMSAS NATAL leading stoker ducthy glass martin langford 11/11/2007 04:36PM
Re: HMSAS NATAL martin langford 12/26/2007 09:51PM
Re: HMSAS NATAL Richmond Wilmot 05/10/2008 11:25AM


Your Name: 
Your Email: 
Subject: 
Spam prevention:
Please, enter the code that you see below in the input field. This is for blocking bots that try to post this form automatically.
  ******   ********   **        **     **  ******** 
 **    **  **     **  **        **     **  **       
 **        **     **  **        **     **  **       
 **        ********   **        *********  ******   
 **        **         **        **     **  **       
 **    **  **         **        **     **  **       
  ******   **         ********  **     **  **