Warship forum
A forum for the Allied Warships section.
Re: USS Pompano
Posted by:
Randy Kinnamon
()
Date: March 06, 2007 05:44AM
Brian V. Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Hi Randy,
>
> the source of the speculative date is Japanese
> records. According to a report...
Are these Japanese records available somewhere, well, an English translation of them? The curious thing to me is that official U.S. Navy reports for years have claimed that Japanese records mention no attack on a submarine that could conceivably have been the Pompano. Yet this report seems to be exactly in the time frame and geographic location of Pompano.
Again, I don't want simply to refer to mysterious "Japanese records" unless I can cite a source, besides uboat.net.
-------------------------------------------------------
> Hi Randy,
>
> the source of the speculative date is Japanese
> records. According to a report...
Are these Japanese records available somewhere, well, an English translation of them? The curious thing to me is that official U.S. Navy reports for years have claimed that Japanese records mention no attack on a submarine that could conceivably have been the Pompano. Yet this report seems to be exactly in the time frame and geographic location of Pompano.
Again, I don't want simply to refer to mysterious "Japanese records" unless I can cite a source, besides uboat.net.
Subject | Written By | Posted |
---|---|---|
USS Pompano | Randy Kinnamon | 03/05/2007 08:12AM |
Re: USS Pompano | Brian V. | 03/05/2007 06:10PM |
Re: USS Pompano | DanOdenweller | 03/05/2007 08:01PM |
Re: USS Pompano | becorijn | 03/06/2007 12:03AM |
Re: USS Pompano | Randy Kinnamon | 03/06/2007 05:02AM |
Re: USS Pompano | Brian V. | 03/06/2007 05:21AM |
Re: USS Pompano | Randy Kinnamon | 03/06/2007 05:44AM |
Re: USS Pompano | Brian V. | 03/07/2007 05:27AM |
Re: USS Pompano | Randy Kinnamon | 03/07/2007 06:49AM |
Re: USS Pompano | Randy Kinnamon | 03/07/2007 07:04AM |
Re: USS Pompano | Bruce Dennis | 03/07/2007 08:40AM |