Re: s/s Ryton, 5 August 1917
Posted by:
Michael Lowrey
()
Date: September 13, 2005 02:16PM
Ray,
More likely an intentional ommission/classification decision by the Royal Navy not wishing to admit a merchant was lost while attempting to ram a submarine.
Best wishes,
Michael
More likely an intentional ommission/classification decision by the Royal Navy not wishing to admit a merchant was lost while attempting to ram a submarine.
Best wishes,
Michael