WWI forum  
World War One discussions. 
Re: SS AMSTERDAM
Posted by: Ron Young ()
Date: March 02, 2008 11:32AM

Hi Jim

Very interesting winking smiley

According to Lloyd's War Losses, the Amsterdam was sunk 6-miles SE by E of Coquet Island and that is the problem. There are no large wrecks in either of the positions suggested.

I can add :
Hans Kükenthal’s KTB for the 24 February 1918, states:
" - convoy steering south, in sight consists of six steamers and is protected by destroyer and fishing boat
- Convoy steering zig zag course
- Fired from first tube
- Hit on laden steamer of 2,500 tons
- Loud explosion - since destroyer is close behind stern of boat went to forty metres quickly”

That 2,500-ton steamer was the 806-ton SS AMSTERDAM (ex AVON 1877 - Rankine Line Ltd., Glasgow) which he torpedoed and sunk without warning.

Cheers Ron

Options: ReplyQuote


Subject Written By Posted
SS AMSTERDAM Ron Young 02/21/2008 06:27PM
Re: SS AMSTERDAM jim 02/29/2008 04:44PM
Re: SS AMSTERDAM Ron Young 02/29/2008 07:52PM
Re: SS AMSTERDAM Jim 03/01/2008 04:41PM
Re: SS AMSTERDAM Ron Young 03/02/2008 11:32AM


Your Name: 
Your Email: 
Subject: 
Spam prevention:
Please, enter the code that you see below in the input field. This is for blocking bots that try to post this form automatically.
       **   *******   **    **   ******   **    ** 
       **  **     **  ***   **  **    **  **   **  
       **  **     **  ****  **  **        **  **   
       **   ********  ** ** **  **        *****    
 **    **         **  **  ****  **        **  **   
 **    **  **     **  **   ***  **    **  **   **  
  ******    *******   **    **   ******   **    **