WWI forum
World War One discussions.
Re: SS AMSTERDAM
Posted by:
Ron Young
()
Date: March 02, 2008 11:32AM
Hi Jim
Very interesting
According to Lloyd's War Losses, the Amsterdam was sunk 6-miles SE by E of Coquet Island and that is the problem. There are no large wrecks in either of the positions suggested.
I can add :
Hans Kükenthal’s KTB for the 24 February 1918, states:
" - convoy steering south, in sight consists of six steamers and is protected by destroyer and fishing boat
- Convoy steering zig zag course
- Fired from first tube
- Hit on laden steamer of 2,500 tons
- Loud explosion - since destroyer is close behind stern of boat went to forty metres quicklyâ€
That 2,500-ton steamer was the 806-ton SS AMSTERDAM (ex AVON 1877 - Rankine Line Ltd., Glasgow) which he torpedoed and sunk without warning.
Cheers Ron
Very interesting
According to Lloyd's War Losses, the Amsterdam was sunk 6-miles SE by E of Coquet Island and that is the problem. There are no large wrecks in either of the positions suggested.
I can add :
Hans Kükenthal’s KTB for the 24 February 1918, states:
" - convoy steering south, in sight consists of six steamers and is protected by destroyer and fishing boat
- Convoy steering zig zag course
- Fired from first tube
- Hit on laden steamer of 2,500 tons
- Loud explosion - since destroyer is close behind stern of boat went to forty metres quicklyâ€
That 2,500-ton steamer was the 806-ton SS AMSTERDAM (ex AVON 1877 - Rankine Line Ltd., Glasgow) which he torpedoed and sunk without warning.
Cheers Ron
Subject | Written By | Posted |
---|---|---|
SS AMSTERDAM | Ron Young | 02/21/2008 06:27PM |
Re: SS AMSTERDAM | jim | 02/29/2008 04:44PM |
Re: SS AMSTERDAM | Ron Young | 02/29/2008 07:52PM |
Re: SS AMSTERDAM | Jim | 03/01/2008 04:41PM |
Re: SS AMSTERDAM | Ron Young | 03/02/2008 11:32AM |