WWI forum  
World War One discussions. 
Go to: Forum List•Message List•New Topic•Search•Log In•Print View
Re: SS AMSTERDAM
Posted by: Ron Young ()
Date: March 02, 2008 11:32AM

Hi Jim

Very interesting winking smiley

According to Lloyd's War Losses, the Amsterdam was sunk 6-miles SE by E of Coquet Island and that is the problem. There are no large wrecks in either of the positions suggested.

I can add :
Hans Kükenthal’s KTB for the 24 February 1918, states:
" - convoy steering south, in sight consists of six steamers and is protected by destroyer and fishing boat
- Convoy steering zig zag course
- Fired from first tube
- Hit on laden steamer of 2,500 tons
- Loud explosion - since destroyer is close behind stern of boat went to forty metres quickly”

That 2,500-ton steamer was the 806-ton SS AMSTERDAM (ex AVON 1877 - Rankine Line Ltd., Glasgow) which he torpedoed and sunk without warning.

Cheers Ron

Options: Reply•Quote


Subject Written By Posted
SS AMSTERDAM Ron Young 02/21/2008 06:27PM
Re: SS AMSTERDAM jim 02/29/2008 04:44PM
Re: SS AMSTERDAM Ron Young 02/29/2008 07:52PM
Re: SS AMSTERDAM Jim 03/01/2008 04:41PM
Re: SS AMSTERDAM Ron Young 03/02/2008 11:32AM


Go to: Forum List•Message List•Search•Log In
Your Name: 
Subject: 
Spam prevention:
Please, enter the code that you see below in the input field. This is for blocking bots that try to post this form automatically.
 ********  **     **  **         **    **  **     ** 
 **        ***   ***  **    **   ***   **  ***   *** 
 **        **** ****  **    **   ****  **  **** **** 
 ******    ** *** **  **    **   ** ** **  ** *** ** 
 **        **     **  *********  **  ****  **     ** 
 **        **     **        **   **   ***  **     ** 
 **        **     **        **   **    **  **     **