General Discussions
This is the place to discuss general issues related to the U-boat war or the war at sea in WWII.
RE: U 676 flak claims. Part 2.
Posted by:
Rainer Kolbicz
()
Date: July 17, 2001 04:18PM
<HTML>Hi Andrey
U-676 probably misidentified the Yak-9 as Il-2 (both single engined).
Personally I do not believe that they downed a heavy armoured Sturmovik.
Perhaps they damaged the Pe-2 (smoke trails or similar). Have you checked this in your sources?
Regards
Rainer</HTML>
U-676 probably misidentified the Yak-9 as Il-2 (both single engined).
Personally I do not believe that they downed a heavy armoured Sturmovik.
Perhaps they damaged the Pe-2 (smoke trails or similar). Have you checked this in your sources?
Regards
Rainer</HTML>
Subject | Written By | Posted |
---|---|---|
U 676 flak claims. Part 2. | Andrey | 07/17/2001 02:21PM |
RE: U 676 flak claims. Part 2. | Rainer Kolbicz | 07/17/2001 04:18PM |
20mm Flakvierling more than enough to down an Il 2 | Nonny | 07/18/2001 04:12PM |
RE: Flakvierling just enough to perhaps down Il 2 | Rainer Kolbicz | 07/18/2001 08:48PM |
RE: Flakvierling just enough to perhaps down Il 2 | Andrey | 07/19/2001 03:47PM |
Was U676 armed with a 3.7 cm/57 Flak M43? | Nonny | 07/19/2001 05:04PM |
RE: Was U676 armed with a 3.7 cm/57 Flak M43? | Rainer Kolbicz | 07/19/2001 10:16PM |
RE: Flakvierling just enough to perhaps down Il 2 | Rainer Kolbicz | 07/19/2001 06:44PM |