RE: U-571 Accuracy
Posted by: Jeffrey LaRue ()
Date: January 02, 2001 05:58PM

<HTML>If (!) the supply sub was in fact one of the purpose-built variants, then that would have been a very surprising response from the captain of the supply sub.

However, we could just as easily assume that the \'supply sub\' was a Type IXD (or some such variant)

...it is, after all, a just movie.

-Jeff</HTML>



Subject Written By Posted
U-571 Accuracy Josh Trower 01/02/2001 03:14AM
RE: U-571 Accuracy Greg Day-Camp 01/02/2001 05:49AM
RE: U-571 Accuracy Greg Day-Camp 01/02/2001 06:12AM
RE: U-571 Accuracy Jeffrey LaRue 01/02/2001 05:58PM
RE: U-571 Accuracy Greg Day-Camp 01/02/2001 06:40PM
RE: U-571 Accuracy Jeffrey LaRue 01/03/2001 06:15PM
RE: U-571 Accuracy MCE 01/02/2001 06:48PM
Existence of 109T confirmed (off topic) MCE 01/02/2001 09:33PM
RE: Existence of 109T confirmed (off topic) Greg Day-Camp 01/03/2001 04:47PM
RE: U-571 Accuracy Thomas C. 01/03/2001 02:18AM
RE: U-571 Accuracy Steve Cooper 01/03/2001 12:38PM
RE: U-571 Accuracy Thomas C. 01/03/2001 03:41PM
RE: U-571 Accuracy Greg Day-Camp 01/03/2001 04:40PM
RE: U-571 Accuracy Steve Cooper 01/02/2001 01:39PM
RE: U-571 Accuracy Josh Trower 01/02/2001 05:40PM
RE: U-571 Accuracy Clark 01/03/2001 12:48AM
RE: U-571 - where the name came from kurt 01/03/2001 11:26PM
RE: U-571 - where the name came from Greg Day-Camp 01/04/2001 04:55AM
RE: U-571 - where the name came from Norman Callahan 01/04/2001 05:26PM
RE: U-571 - where the name came from Stewart 01/06/2001 04:23PM
RE: U-571 Accuracy Greg Day-Camp 01/04/2001 05:40AM
RE: U-571 Accuracy Franky 01/17/2001 11:49PM
RE: U-571 Accuracy Jim 01/05/2001 12:01AM
RE: U-571 Accuracy Jim Cane 01/05/2001 12:02AM
RE: U-571 Accuracy Part..!! John Griffiths 01/27/2001 05:13PM