Warship forum  
A forum for the Allied Warships section. 
Go to: Forum List•Message List•New Topic•Search•Log In•Print View
Re: Petropavlovsk's condition
Posted by: Brian ()
Date: February 20, 2003 04:53AM

<HTML>Please bear in mind that you cannot really call Petropavlovsk an operational unit. She was fitted with 3-203mm guns and acted as a floating battery, unable to move on her own, she could fight (to a certain extent) but not run away, thus lacking the main requirement to be considered a warship: mobility.
Regards, Brian
PS: our gracious host's name is Gudmundur, not Gundmar</HTML>

Options: Reply•Quote


Subject Written By Posted
Lutzow (Hipper-class) in russian service Nakhimovetz 02/19/2003 06:54PM
Re: Petropavlovsk's condition Brian 02/20/2003 04:53AM
Re: Petropavlovsk's condition George Roumbos 02/20/2003 02:14PM
Re: Lutzow (Hipper-class) in russian service Gerard 02/20/2003 05:24PM
Re: Lutzow (Hipper-class) in russian service George Roumbos 02/24/2003 01:54PM
Re: Lutzow (Hipper-class) in russian service J.S. 02/26/2003 06:34PM


Go to: Forum List•Message List•Search•Log In
Your Name: 
Subject: 
Spam prevention:
Please, enter the code that you see below in the input field. This is for blocking bots that try to post this form automatically.
 **        **      **  ********        **  ********  
 **        **  **  **  **              **  **     ** 
 **        **  **  **  **              **  **     ** 
 **        **  **  **  ******          **  **     ** 
 **        **  **  **  **        **    **  **     ** 
 **        **  **  **  **        **    **  **     ** 
 ********   ***  ***   **         ******   ********