WWI forum
World War One discussions.
Re: UB 66 place of loss
Posted by:
Michael Lowrey
()
Date: February 24, 2003 02:14PM
<HTML>I agree, Oliver, nice research.
Axel, I expect that you will see a great deal of updates to the World War I loss listings in the next few years. The combination of additional archival research plus the numerous underwater discoveries will improve our understanding. Actually, it already has - witness the new information or revised fates of U 11, U 37, U 77, UB 20, UB 39, UB 58, UB 78, UB 107, UC 62, UC 78 and UC 79. And I am certain there is more to come...
Best wishes,
Michael</HTML>
Axel, I expect that you will see a great deal of updates to the World War I loss listings in the next few years. The combination of additional archival research plus the numerous underwater discoveries will improve our understanding. Actually, it already has - witness the new information or revised fates of U 11, U 37, U 77, UB 20, UB 39, UB 58, UB 78, UB 107, UC 62, UC 78 and UC 79. And I am certain there is more to come...
Best wishes,
Michael</HTML>
Subject | Written By | Posted |
---|---|---|
UB 66 place of loss | Brian | 02/22/2003 05:13AM |
Re: UB 66 place of loss | Dänemark | 02/22/2003 09:21AM |
Re: UB 66 place of loss | Oliver Lörscher | 02/22/2003 10:19AM |
Re: UB 66 place of loss | kpp | 02/22/2003 12:00PM |
Re: UB 66 place of loss | kpp | 02/22/2003 11:58AM |
Re: UB 66 place of loss | kpp | 02/22/2003 11:59AM |
Re: UB 66 place of loss | Michael Lowrey | 02/22/2003 12:05PM |
Re: UB 66 place of loss | Brian | 02/22/2003 07:23PM |
Re: UB 66 place of loss | Oliver Lörscher | 02/22/2003 09:16PM |
Re: UB 66 place of loss | kpp | 02/22/2003 10:36PM |
Re: UB 66 place of loss | kpp | 02/22/2003 10:46PM |
Re: UB 66 place of loss | Oliver Lörscher | 02/23/2003 12:13PM |
Re: UB 66 place of loss | Axel | 02/24/2003 07:25AM |
Re: UB 66 place of loss | Michael Lowrey | 02/24/2003 02:14PM |