WWI forum
World War One discussions.
Re: U139
Posted by:
Michael Lowrey
()
Date: March 30, 2009 04:21AM
Joe,
Upon reflection, I don't think the "it" is actually U 139's KTB. More likely, it's U 139's logs. That's largely a distinction without a difference, as it's certainly possible to attribute out sinkings from the logs.
Best wishes,
Michael
Upon reflection, I don't think the "it" is actually U 139's KTB. More likely, it's U 139's logs. That's largely a distinction without a difference, as it's certainly possible to attribute out sinkings from the logs.
Best wishes,
Michael
Subject | Written By | Posted |
---|---|---|
U139 | Josephbremez | 03/29/2009 03:21PM |
Re: U139 | Michael Lowrey | 03/29/2009 04:08PM |
Re: U139 | Josephbremez | 03/29/2009 05:27PM |
Re: U139 | Michael Lowrey | 03/30/2009 04:21AM |
Re: U139 | Josephbremez | 03/30/2009 04:09PM |
Re: U139 | Michael Lowrey | 03/30/2009 05:06PM |
Re: U139 | Yves D | 03/30/2009 07:12AM |
Re: U139 | Michael Lowrey | 03/30/2009 09:38AM |
Re: U139 | Yves D | 03/30/2009 11:52AM |
Re: U139 | Oliver Lörscher | 03/30/2009 08:59PM |
Re: U139 | Yves D | 03/31/2009 07:00AM |
Re: U139 | Oliver Lörscher | 03/31/2009 11:39AM |
Re: U139 | Simon S. | 03/31/2009 03:14PM |
Re: U139 | Michael Lowrey | 03/31/2009 03:29PM |
Re: U139 | Yves D | 03/31/2009 11:43AM |