Technology and Operations
This forum is for discussing technological & operational matters pertaining to U-boats.
Re: Accustic signature
Posted by:
marco aurelio
()
Date: April 20, 2002 10:49PM
What about the detection range of surface vessel's passive hull sonars in the WW2?
I try to calculate the transmission loss using a very simplyfied experssion:
TL = 66dB + 10 log Range (mn) + 2alfa Range, and assumed the sound wold propagate in direct path ( to simplificate ), but in fact I do not have any information about the efficience of a WW2 passive sonar.
Could you give me some ligth in this respect?
[]s
marco
I try to calculate the transmission loss using a very simplyfied experssion:
TL = 66dB + 10 log Range (mn) + 2alfa Range, and assumed the sound wold propagate in direct path ( to simplificate ), but in fact I do not have any information about the efficience of a WW2 passive sonar.
Could you give me some ligth in this respect?
[]s
marco
Subject | Written By | Posted |
---|---|---|
Accustic signature | marco aurelio | 04/11/2002 12:12AM |
Re: Accustic signature | Sniper | 04/20/2002 03:25AM |
Re: Accustic signature | marco aurelio | 04/20/2002 12:58PM |
Re: Accustic signature | Sniper | 04/20/2002 04:26PM |
Re: Accustic signature | marco aurelio | 04/20/2002 10:28PM |
Re: Accustic signature | Ken Dunn | 04/20/2002 07:15PM |
Re: Accustic signature | Sniper | 04/20/2002 09:26PM |
Re: Accustic signature | marco aurelio | 04/20/2002 10:49PM |
Re: Accustic signature | Sniper | 04/21/2002 01:02AM |
Re: Accustic signature | marco aurelio | 04/22/2002 08:49AM |
Re: Accustic signature | Sniper | 04/23/2002 09:03AM |
Angular accuracy | SuperKraut | 04/28/2002 07:14AM |
Re: Angular accuracy | Sniper | 04/28/2002 06:39PM |