WWI forum
Hi Mark
This information is coherent with both sources (Spindler and Bendert)and the dbase of this site except for the date which is actually Nov.16. She was sunk by UC26 at the indicated location. But for sure, such a position expressed only in dd.mm is very imprecise.
I haven't this KTB. Maybe Michael has an answer ?
Yves
World War One discussions.
Re: San Nicolau
Posted by:
Yves D
()
Date: August 04, 2005 12:56PM
Hi Mark
This information is coherent with both sources (Spindler and Bendert)and the dbase of this site except for the date which is actually Nov.16. She was sunk by UC26 at the indicated location. But for sure, such a position expressed only in dd.mm is very imprecise.
I haven't this KTB. Maybe Michael has an answer ?
Yves
Subject | Written By | Posted |
---|---|---|
San Nicolau | toerag | 08/04/2005 09:47AM |
Re: San Nicolau | Yves D | 08/04/2005 12:56PM |
Re: San Nicolau | toerag | 08/04/2005 01:14PM |
Re: San Nicolau | Michael Lowrey | 08/04/2005 01:42PM |
Re: San Nicolau | Simon | 08/04/2005 08:04PM |
Re: San Nicolau | Simon | 08/04/2005 08:10PM |
Re: San Nicolau | Yves D | 08/04/2005 09:50PM |
Re: San Nicolau | Simon | 08/05/2005 02:35PM |
Re: San Nicolau | Yves D | 08/06/2005 07:53PM |
Re: San Nicolau | toerag | 08/07/2005 09:55PM |
Re: San Nicolau | Michael Lowrey | 08/08/2005 01:07AM |
Re: San Nicolau | toerag | 08/08/2005 09:29AM |
Re: San Nicolau | Yves D | 08/08/2005 12:28PM |
Re: San Nicolao | Yves D | 08/08/2005 12:31PM |
Re: San Nicolau | Michael Lowrey | 08/09/2005 05:11AM |
Re: San Nicolau | Yves D | 08/09/2005 07:12AM |