RE: Inconsistency in Rohwer
Posted by: Ted Agar ()
Date: June 06, 2001 07:47PM

<HTML>Evening Jan-Olof,
Your suspicion is correct I have just checked the Convoy Form A1 for ON166 for 11/02/43 and the Thorsholm is not included.
Regards Ted A.</HTML>



Subject Written By Posted
Inconsistency in Rohwer Jan-Olof 06/06/2001 07:20PM
RE: Inconsistency in Rohwer Ted Agar 06/06/2001 07:47PM
RE: Inconsistency in Rohwer Siri Lawson 06/06/2001 09:43PM
RE: Inconsistency in Rohwer Siri 06/06/2001 09:54PM
RE: Inconsistency in Rohwer Rainer Kolbicz 06/07/2001 05:10PM
RE: Inconsistency in Rohwer Jan-Olof 06/06/2001 09:44PM
RE: Inconsistency in Rohwer Josef Pijacek 06/07/2001 10:00AM
RE: Inconsistency in Rohwer Rainer Kolbicz 06/07/2001 04:54PM
RE: Inconsistency in Rohwer Jan-Olof 06/07/2001 07:50PM
RE: Inconsistency in Rohwer Rainer Kolbicz 06/08/2001 08:03PM
RE: Inconsistency in Rohwer Siri 06/07/2001 09:30PM
RE: Inconsistency in Rohwer Jan-Olof 06/07/2001 09:37PM
RE: Inconsistency in Rohwer Rainer Kolbicz 06/08/2001 08:35PM
RE: Inconsistency in Rohwer Siri Lawson 06/10/2001 06:00AM
RE: Inconsistency in Rohwer Josef Pijacek 06/08/2001 06:30AM
RE: Inconsistency in Rohwer Rainer Kolbicz 06/08/2001 08:09PM
RE: Inconsistency in Rohwer Josef Pijacek 06/09/2001 05:08PM
RE: Inconsistency in Rohwer Ted Agar 06/07/2001 09:19PM
RE: Inconsistency in Rohwer Jan-Olof 06/07/2001 09:33PM
RE: Inconsistency in Rohwer Ted Agar 06/07/2001 10:59PM
RE: Inconsistency in Rohwer Josef Pijacek 06/08/2001 06:22AM
RE: Inconsistency in Rohwer Rainer Kolbicz 06/08/2001 08:59PM