General Discussions  
This is the place to discuss general issues related to the U-boat war or the war at sea in WWII. 
RE: Inconsistency in Rohwer
Posted by: Ted Agar ()
Date: June 07, 2001 09:19PM

<HTML>Evening Rainer and the rest of the crew,
Sorry to be straggling by the clock but have just arrived home to read the posts.My comments about the Convoy Form A1 are about the Convoy layout which is contained in the admiralty records held at the UK Public Records Office. Each convoy was built up on a grid, 12 columns
wide and 5 columns deep. On the form each ship is allocated a sailing position the columns were numbered 01 to 12 across or less if required, and each columnwas numbered 11 to 15 or 21 to 25 deep. The rear Starboard vessel would sail in position 125. Some documents say that 9 columns was the maximum and that the 10th column would be allocated as 9A and the 11th column as 9b and so on but this is not so on many of the Con.Form A1 which exist, as in the case of ON166 where the grid is laid out as below:-
01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 Columns
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
11 21 31 41 51 61 71 81 91 101 111 121
12 22 32 42 52 62 72 82 92 102 112 122
13 23 33 43 53 63 73 83 93 103 113 123 SHIP POSITIONS
14 24 34 44 54 64 74 84 94 104 114 124
15 25 35 45 55 65 75 85 95 105 115 125
Each box in the grid contains the details of :- Ships Name, Tonnage, Nationality,
Type of Ship, Mast Head height and if it is Commodore or Vice-Commodore of the convoy, also its signalling capabilities e.g. Radio Telephone, Coloured Lights,
Direction Finding Etc. I hope this clarifies the use of the Convoy Form.

Regards Ted A.</HTML>

Options: ReplyQuote


Subject Written By Posted
Inconsistency in Rohwer Jan-Olof 06/06/2001 07:20PM
RE: Inconsistency in Rohwer Ted Agar 06/06/2001 07:47PM
RE: Inconsistency in Rohwer Siri Lawson 06/06/2001 09:43PM
RE: Inconsistency in Rohwer Siri 06/06/2001 09:54PM
RE: Inconsistency in Rohwer Rainer Kolbicz 06/07/2001 05:10PM
RE: Inconsistency in Rohwer Jan-Olof 06/06/2001 09:44PM
RE: Inconsistency in Rohwer Josef Pijacek 06/07/2001 10:00AM
RE: Inconsistency in Rohwer Rainer Kolbicz 06/07/2001 04:54PM
RE: Inconsistency in Rohwer Jan-Olof 06/07/2001 07:50PM
RE: Inconsistency in Rohwer Rainer Kolbicz 06/08/2001 08:03PM
RE: Inconsistency in Rohwer Siri 06/07/2001 09:30PM
RE: Inconsistency in Rohwer Jan-Olof 06/07/2001 09:37PM
RE: Inconsistency in Rohwer Rainer Kolbicz 06/08/2001 08:35PM
RE: Inconsistency in Rohwer Siri Lawson 06/10/2001 06:00AM
RE: Inconsistency in Rohwer Josef Pijacek 06/08/2001 06:30AM
RE: Inconsistency in Rohwer Rainer Kolbicz 06/08/2001 08:09PM
RE: Inconsistency in Rohwer Josef Pijacek 06/09/2001 05:08PM
RE: Inconsistency in Rohwer Ted Agar 06/07/2001 09:19PM
RE: Inconsistency in Rohwer Jan-Olof 06/07/2001 09:33PM
RE: Inconsistency in Rohwer Ted Agar 06/07/2001 10:59PM
RE: Inconsistency in Rohwer Josef Pijacek 06/08/2001 06:22AM
RE: Inconsistency in Rohwer Rainer Kolbicz 06/08/2001 08:59PM


Your Name: 
Your Email: 
Subject: 
Spam prevention:
Please, enter the code that you see below in the input field. This is for blocking bots that try to post this form automatically.
 **     **  **    **  **     **  **      **  **     ** 
 **     **  ***   **  **     **  **  **  **  ***   *** 
 **     **  ****  **  **     **  **  **  **  **** **** 
 **     **  ** ** **  **     **  **  **  **  ** *** ** 
  **   **   **  ****   **   **   **  **  **  **     ** 
   ** **    **   ***    ** **    **  **  **  **     ** 
    ***     **    **     ***      ***  ***   **     **