Movies and Films  
This is the forum for Movie and Film discussions. Again, our topic is naval warfare in WWII for the most part. 
Re: In Japanese streets
Posted by: kurt ()
Date: January 07, 2004 12:51PM

<HTML>Don:

We are getting a bit off topic here, but a fair question.

No. The military period in Japanese history was an aberration. Japan is historically an isolationist country. No doubt in my mind that democracy and peacefulness are well rooted in the public's mind.

The main reason the defense budget is large is because their economy is huge - again, second largest in the world. They spend only 1% of their GDP on defense - one of the lowest levels in the world. But 1% of a huge number is a huge number.

Also note that the 1% is spent very inefficiently - the main goal being technology development and independence, not combat capability. Japanese developed and produced weapons are 3 to 5 times as expensive - and often not as good - as US equivalents.

The weapons they procure are also limited by a long list of restrictions to prevent them being capable of being used offensively. For example, until very recently, they could not use aerial refueling, or ocean going transport, or even own desert uniforms - nothing to allow deployment outside of Japan.

Their subs are restricted to being small, 'coastal' types with no nuclear propulsion, and, obviously, no nuclear weapons.

I could go on, but you get the idea. As the war fades from living memory, I expect Japan's military to become a more 'normal' military, like those of Western Europe. You can see that beginning with their participation in Iraq's rebuilding, etc.

Regards,

Kurt</HTML>

Options: ReplyQuote


Subject Written By Posted
In Enemy Hands Frank Blazich 01/01/2004 03:30AM
Re: In Enemy Hands TomW 01/01/2004 06:47PM
Re: In Enemy Hands ROBERT M. 01/02/2004 01:57AM
Re: In Enemy Hands Patrick Malone 01/02/2004 07:21PM
Re: In Enemy Hands annox 01/02/2004 05:44PM
Re: In Enemy Hands Patrick Malone 01/02/2004 07:28PM
Re: In Enemy Hands annox 01/02/2004 09:39PM
Re: In Enemy Hands Patrick Malone 01/02/2004 09:53PM
Re: In Enemy Hands annox 01/02/2004 10:19PM
Re: In Enemy Hands Don Johnston 01/03/2004 02:22AM
Re: In Enemy Hands kurt 01/03/2004 02:28PM
Re: In Enemy Hands Don Johnston 01/03/2004 08:28PM
Re: In Enemy Hands ROBERT M. 01/04/2004 03:12AM
Re: In Enemy Hands Don Johnston 01/04/2004 04:03AM
Re: In Enemy Hands Wayne 01/04/2004 03:09PM
Re: In Enemy Hands ROBERT M. 01/04/2004 05:17PM
Re: In Enemy Hands annox 01/04/2004 03:49AM
Re: In Enemy Hands ROBERT M. 01/04/2004 05:21PM
Re: In Enemy Hands annox 01/04/2004 08:01PM
Re: In Enemy Hands annox 01/06/2004 06:19AM
Re: In Enemy Hands Don Johnston 01/06/2004 11:56PM
Re: In Enemy Hands annox 01/07/2004 06:59AM
Re: In Enemy Hands kurt 01/05/2004 08:53PM
Re: In Enemy Hands J.T. McDaniel 01/05/2004 11:32PM
Re: In Enemy Hands annox 01/06/2004 06:57AM
In Japanese streets kurt 01/06/2004 01:33PM
Re: In Japanese streets J.T. McDaniel 01/06/2004 11:41PM
Re: In Japanese streets Don Johnston 01/06/2004 11:52PM
Re: In Japanese streets kurt 01/07/2004 12:51PM
Re: In Enemy Hands 64 01/02/2004 02:21PM
Re: In Enemy Hands sip7 01/08/2004 02:36PM
Re: In Enemy Hands annox 01/09/2004 04:19AM
Re: In Enemy Hands Gwen 03/19/2004 04:00PM
Re: In Enemy Hands anders 12/02/2004 09:54PM


Your Name: 
Your Email: 
Subject: 
Spam prevention:
Please, enter the code that you see below in the input field. This is for blocking bots that try to post this form automatically.
  ******    **    **  **    **        **  **     ** 
 **    **    **  **   ***   **        **  **     ** 
 **           ****    ****  **        **  **     ** 
 **   ****     **     ** ** **        **  **     ** 
 **    **      **     **  ****  **    **  **     ** 
 **    **      **     **   ***  **    **  **     ** 
  ******       **     **    **   ******    *******