General Discussions
This is the place to discuss general issues related to the U-boat war or the war at sea in WWII.
RE: why
Posted by:
kurt
()
Date: February 01, 2001 10:28PM
<HTML>There has not been a war between a power with a lot of subs and a nation with a lot of shipping or a major navy since WWII. So no subs sinking ships.
Also, sub use in war tends to be in total war: sinking merchant ships and so forth. Politics in small \'brushfire\' wars nowadays does not permit this.
Subs have done a lot though. Nuclear deterence relies ever increasingly on subs. By the very nature of the mission of deterence, just because they haven\'t been used doesn\'t mean they weren\'t doing anything useful: their presence deters aggression and attack.
Attack boats, by threatening the other side\'s boomers, adds to the uncertainty, and further deters an aggressor from provacative moves.
Subs have done a lot since WWII, it is just not easily seen.</HTML>
Also, sub use in war tends to be in total war: sinking merchant ships and so forth. Politics in small \'brushfire\' wars nowadays does not permit this.
Subs have done a lot though. Nuclear deterence relies ever increasingly on subs. By the very nature of the mission of deterence, just because they haven\'t been used doesn\'t mean they weren\'t doing anything useful: their presence deters aggression and attack.
Attack boats, by threatening the other side\'s boomers, adds to the uncertainty, and further deters an aggressor from provacative moves.
Subs have done a lot since WWII, it is just not easily seen.</HTML>