General Discussions  
This is the place to discuss general issues related to the U-boat war or the war at sea in WWII. 
RE: why - why not - belgrano / etc
Posted by: John Griffiths ()
Date: February 16, 2001 09:39PM

<HTML>Rainer,

Many greetings - and thank you for your comments which made me dig out most of my reference books!

The \'Belgrano\' was laid down by the New York Shipbuilders 15.4.35 and commissioned 18.3.39. She was one of the \'Brooklyn\' class, from which derived the \'Cleveland\' class cruisers. The \'Clevelands\' mounted 6\" guns. The \'Brooklyn\'s were built to answer the Japanese \'Mogami\' class of 6 inch gun cruisers.

The ARA General Belgrano was acquired by Argentina in 1951 together with her sister ship ARA Nueve de Julio, which was scrapped in 1979. She had an armour belt which varied between 1.5 to 4 inches thick and deck armour of between two and three inches. She was also the last armoured warship afloat in active service at the time.

She also, as you stated correctly, packed 15x6 inch guns! Ick! There\'s my failing eyesight again, Rainer!

The guns were mounted in 5 triple turrets, she also had 8 single 5 inchers, 2 x twin 40mm guns plus quad Sea Cat SAMs. Two helios were also fitted.

To arrive at this figure I had to do a lot of searching - but found a mistake in one of my books which states that she carried 5 x 3 15 inch guns...

Thanks for your comments, Rainer. I also appreciate your pointing out the mistake made, for which I apologise.

John</HTML>

Options: ReplyQuote


Subject Written By Posted
why tony 02/01/2001 08:10PM
RE: why John Griffiths 02/01/2001 08:46PM
RE: why kurt 02/01/2001 10:28PM
RE: why Lawrence 02/01/2001 11:17PM
RE: why VHeimpel 02/02/2001 10:19AM
RE: why - why not. John Griffiths 02/02/2001 07:58PM
RE: why - why not. Rainer Bruns 02/02/2001 08:40PM
RE: why - why not. MPC 02/02/2001 09:18PM
RE: why - why not. John Griffiths 02/02/2001 11:11PM
Not blaming VHeimpel 02/03/2001 12:25PM
RE: Not blaming John Griffiths 02/03/2001 01:59PM
RE: why - why not. tony 02/03/2001 03:04PM
RE: why - why not - Tony John Griffiths 02/04/2001 01:35PM
RE: why - why not - Tony Steve Roberts 02/14/2001 11:35AM
RE: Maggie Thatcher unhinged???? MPC 02/14/2001 05:47PM
RE: why - why not - belgrano / etc John Griffiths 02/14/2001 07:01PM
RE: why - why not - belgrano / etc Rainer Bruns 02/16/2001 03:45AM
RE: why - why not - belgrano / etc John Griffiths 02/16/2001 09:39PM
RE: why - why not - belgrano / etc Rainer Bruns 02/17/2001 02:52AM
RE: why - why not - belgrano / etc Rainer John Griffiths 02/17/2001 11:58AM


Your Name: 
Your Email: 
Subject: 
Spam prevention:
Please, enter the code that you see below in the input field. This is for blocking bots that try to post this form automatically.
  *******   ********  ********   **    **  **     ** 
 **     **     **     **     **  ***   **  **     ** 
 **            **     **     **  ****  **  **     ** 
 ********      **     ********   ** ** **  **     ** 
 **     **     **     **         **  ****   **   **  
 **     **     **     **         **   ***    ** **   
  *******      **     **         **    **     ***