General Discussions
This is the place to discuss general issues related to the U-boat war or the war at sea in WWII.
help for a landlubber
Posted by:
Tom Iwanski
()
Date: August 16, 2001 08:21PM
<HTML>Hi all,
I\'d like to know what the term \"heave-to\" means. In the context I\'m speaking of, a destroyer captain is speaking to his Exec after being told to expect gale force ten winds. He says \". . . in a force ten we should heave-to, but we can\'t. Not enough fuel.\"
I assume he means head into the wind to avoid large waves from behind swamping the boat?
Later in the chapter, the captain stated that so long as the wind and the sea stayed on the beam things would be OK, but if the helmsman relaxed and allowed the ship\'s head to veer to starboard, the sea would be on the ship\'s quarter and it would lose control, swing stern to sea and get pooped.
Once again, I am assuming that the the wind and sea is on the ship\'s port, parallel to the centerline, or beam, of the destroyer. I interpret the captain\'s statement as any turn toward starboard would put the ship\'s stern port quarter toward the waves and cause a loss of control, correct? If that is correct, could someone explain some of the dynamics of how a ship and its steering gear behave in a heavy sea? Also, wouldn\'t heavy seas on your beam increase risk of capsizing?
Many thanks,
Tom </HTML>
I\'d like to know what the term \"heave-to\" means. In the context I\'m speaking of, a destroyer captain is speaking to his Exec after being told to expect gale force ten winds. He says \". . . in a force ten we should heave-to, but we can\'t. Not enough fuel.\"
I assume he means head into the wind to avoid large waves from behind swamping the boat?
Later in the chapter, the captain stated that so long as the wind and the sea stayed on the beam things would be OK, but if the helmsman relaxed and allowed the ship\'s head to veer to starboard, the sea would be on the ship\'s quarter and it would lose control, swing stern to sea and get pooped.
Once again, I am assuming that the the wind and sea is on the ship\'s port, parallel to the centerline, or beam, of the destroyer. I interpret the captain\'s statement as any turn toward starboard would put the ship\'s stern port quarter toward the waves and cause a loss of control, correct? If that is correct, could someone explain some of the dynamics of how a ship and its steering gear behave in a heavy sea? Also, wouldn\'t heavy seas on your beam increase risk of capsizing?
Many thanks,
Tom </HTML>
Subject | Written By | Posted |
---|---|---|
help for a landlubber | Tom Iwanski | 08/16/2001 08:21PM |
RE: help for a landlubber | walter M | 08/16/2001 09:17PM |
RE: help for a landlubber | Will | 08/16/2001 10:01PM |
RE: help for a landlubber | Malcolm Cowie | 08/17/2001 04:50AM |
RE: help for a landlubber | Hank | 08/17/2001 01:34PM |
RE: help for a landlubber | parade | 08/17/2001 02:34PM |
RE: help for a landlubber | Rainer Bruns | 08/17/2001 04:35PM |
RE: help for a landlubber | J.T. McDaniel | 08/17/2001 10:56PM |
RE: help for a landlubber | Hank | 08/19/2001 04:22PM |
RE: help for a landlubber | John Griffiths | 08/17/2001 02:27PM |
RE: help for a landlubber | Rainer Bruns | 08/17/2001 04:27PM |
RE: help for a landlubber | John Griffiths | 08/17/2001 08:09PM |
RE: help for a landlubber | Tom Iwanski | 08/17/2001 06:00PM |
RE: help for a landlubber | Antonio Veiga | 08/17/2001 05:56PM |
RE: help for a landlubber | Takeo | 08/18/2001 03:42PM |