Re: Submarine Command with Holden.
Posted by:
huskie85
()
Date: January 10, 2004 01:15AM
<HTML>I tend to agree with the other views posted: that the technical aspects were ignored in order to make the movie more "creative". However, I have also read that some US sub commanders often distrusted their aircraft radar, beleiving that it actually attracted enemy planes. Therefore they generally left the radar off and relied on visual sightings. Take your pick - it's only a movie.
- HK85</HTML>
- HK85</HTML>
| Subject | Written By | Posted |
|---|---|---|
Submarine Command with Holden.
|
Les Hubert | 01/06/2004 04:17PM |
|
Re: Submarine Command with Holden.
|
J.T. McDaniel | 01/06/2004 11:29PM |
|
Re: Submarine Command with Holden.
|
ROBERT M. | 01/09/2004 05:34AM |
|
Re: Submarine Command with Holden.
|
huskie85 | 01/10/2004 01:15AM |
|
Re: Submarine Command with Holden.
|
ROBERT M. | 01/10/2004 06:34AM |
|
Re: Submarine Command with Holden.
|
kurt | 01/16/2004 05:00PM |
|
Re: Submarine Command with Holden.
|
ROBERT M. | 01/11/2004 01:40AM |
|
Re: Submarine Command with Holden.
|
huskie85 | 01/11/2004 03:15AM |
|
Re: Submarine Command with Holden.
|
J.T. McDaniel | 01/11/2004 03:57AM |