Technology and Operations  
This forum is for discussing technological & operational matters pertaining to U-boats. 
RE: Type VIIC's in 2000
Posted by: Don Baker ()
Date: June 22, 2000 11:26PM

Robert
The basic problem with the Type VII, IX, and even the newer type XXI boats was that they were basically surface craft with a limited underwater endurance. Fitting them with the advanced detectors we have today would not have overcome this basic characteristic of those boats. No matter what, they had to return to the surface about every 24 hours more or less to replenish air supplies and charge batteries. The anti-submarine tactics were designed to take advantage of this need for air. Actually, the U-boats highest success rate came during that period of the war when they had essentially unlimited access to the surface of the ocean with freedom from detection. The usual tactic during that period was for the U-boat to run at high speed on the surface (and they were relatively fast on the surface - just look at the hull design ) to get into attack position. Depending on the target and whether or not it was escorted the U-boat would then submerge to periscope depth, develop the firing solution, and fire torpedoes when the target came into range. During the very early stages of the war where they did not have to worry about aircraft, many U-boats attacked on the surface and sank their targets with gunfire in order to save the expensive torpedos.
Two Allied technical developments changed all this; (1) the development of airborne radar, and (2) the HuffDuff network. Once these two developments went on line there was no place the sub could go to be free of detection and attack. The HuffDuff stations could develop the position of a U-boat whenever it transmitted by radio - and the U-boats did a lot of radio transmitting. The accuracy of the "fix" on a U-boats position varied greatly depending on a lot of factors but it was generally accurate enough to vector ships and aircraft into the subs general position where it could be searched for by radar and/or sonar. Once the presence of a submarine had been determined and the "hunt" began the submarine had little chance. Forced to remain submerged, the submarine lost its mobility and was forced into evasive actions until it ran out of battery and/or air. Once forced to the surface the U-boat only rarely escaped.
Allied developments in improved weapons such as the "hedgehog", larger fast sinking depth charges, rockets, sonobuoys, and the "Fido" homing torpedo served mainly to increase the "kill rate" but the submarine had to be found and localized before these weapons could be used.

It was the fact that the WWII submarine was an "airbreather" which was its undoing and the addition of improved detectors would not have changed this basic fact. And that is also why the modern submarine is such a deadly weapon - it doesn't have to come to the surface and thereby reveal its position.
Hope this is usefull to you.
Don B

Options: ReplyQuote


Subject Written By Posted
Type VIIC's in 2000 Robert Eno 06/22/2000 01:04AM
RE: Type VIIC's in 2000 Rainer Bruns 06/22/2000 01:15AM
RE: Type VIIC's in 2000 joe brandt 06/23/2000 02:27AM
RE: Type VIIC's in 2000 Joe 06/22/2000 08:46AM
RE: Type VIIC's in 2000 Robert Eno 06/22/2000 11:23PM
RE: Type VIIC's in 2000 Joe 06/23/2000 05:11AM
RE: Type VIIC's in 2000 Robert Eno 06/24/2000 03:43AM
RE: Type VIIC's in 2000 Joe 06/24/2000 06:55AM
RE: Type VIIC's in 2000 Robert Eno 06/24/2000 09:18PM
RE: Type VIIC's in 2000 Don Baker 06/22/2000 11:26PM
RE: Type VIIC's in 2000 Robert Eno 06/23/2000 12:18AM
RE: Type VIIC's in 2000 Sergio Ferraro 06/23/2000 06:47AM
RE: Type VIIC's in 2000 SuperKraut 07/01/2000 01:59PM
RE: Type VIIC's in 2000 Andreas Hansen 02/27/2003 04:54PM
RE: Type VIIC's in 2000 Davi Plummer 06/23/2000 01:39AM
RE: Type VIIC's in 2000 Garth Mobey 06/23/2000 05:39AM
RE: Type VIIC's in 2000 Garth Mobey 06/28/2000 05:22AM
RE: Type VIIC's in 2000 Mike Sung 06/24/2000 05:08AM
RE: The Falklands... David Plummer 06/29/2000 06:58PM
RE: Type VIIC's in 2000 SuperKraut 07/01/2000 02:03PM
RE: Type VIIC's in 2000 Wheete 06/24/2000 05:39AM
RE: Type VIIC's in 2000 SuperKraut 07/01/2000 02:04PM
The Falklands... The Mule 06/29/2000 01:57PM
RE: The Falklands... Rainer Bruns 06/29/2000 02:47PM
RE: The Falklands... The Mule 06/30/2000 01:21PM


Your Name: 
Your Email: 
Subject: 
Spam prevention:
Please, enter the code that you see below in the input field. This is for blocking bots that try to post this form automatically.
 ********  **     **  ********  **     **  **    ** 
 **        **     **  **        ***   ***  ***   ** 
 **        **     **  **        **** ****  ****  ** 
 ******    **     **  ******    ** *** **  ** ** ** 
 **        **     **  **        **     **  **  **** 
 **        **     **  **        **     **  **   *** 
 ********   *******   ********  **     **  **    **