General Discussions  
This is the place to discuss general issues related to the U-boat war or the war at sea in WWII. 
RE: Metox & Naxos
Posted by: John R. ()
Date: August 29, 2001 03:20PM

<HTML>The spurious emissions coming from a receiver can indeed be picked up by another receiver. It was enough of a problem that the US Navy gave RCA a \"spare no expense\" contract to develop a receiver that would not radiate. The result was the RBA series of radios.

The problem is that radio receivers (with the exception of a crystal set) have oscillators in them that will radiate enough energy to be picked up at some distance. the worst offender was the Armstrong, or regenerative detector. If improperly adjusted, one of these could be heard for miles. The Superheterodyne detector (also invented by Armstrong) radiated to a lesser extent.

One of the interference problems that has plagued me as a Ham Radio operator is the constant \"FWIP....FWIP....FWIP...\" Noise I get on some 2 Metre frequencies. What these always turn out to be is a police scanner that has a channel 10.7 or 10.8 Mcs. above the ham channel I\'m monitoring. Another time, a fellow who lived 5 blocks away and who worked for a pipeline company drove his company truck home and left his 2-way on over night. this caused a strong interfering carrier from his truck.

The absolute WORST offender, though, is a Television set! There is an oscillator there that runs at 15.750 kcs., and it creates hamonic energy well into the SW spectrum. The 3.58 Mcs. colour burst oscillators are quite noisy, too. I sometimes can tell how many TV\'s are on in my neighbourhood by listening to them drop off one by one late at night. If U-Boats had had TV, the Allies would not have needed Huff-Duff...:)</HTML>

Options: ReplyQuote


Subject Written By Posted
Metox vrs FuMB Peter 08/25/2001 12:32PM
RE: Metox vrs FuMB Erik E 08/25/2001 05:31PM
RE: Metox vrs FuMB Rainer Kolbicz 08/25/2001 05:32PM
RE: Metox vrs FuMB oliver 08/25/2001 08:25PM
RE: Metox vrs FuMB Antonio Veiga 08/25/2001 09:52PM
RE: Metox vrs FuMB Antonio Veiga 08/25/2001 10:09PM
RE: Metox vrs FuMB walter M 08/26/2001 08:22PM
Metox transmissions SuperKraut 08/26/2001 09:05PM
RE: Metox transmissions kurt 08/26/2001 09:31PM
RE: Metox transmissions SuperKraut 08/27/2001 06:20AM
RE: Metox &amp; Naxos walter M 08/27/2001 12:56PM
RE: Metox &amp; Naxos Steve Cooper 08/28/2001 09:35PM
RE: Metox &amp; Naxos walter M 08/28/2001 10:54PM
RE: Metox &amp; Naxos John R. 08/29/2001 03:20PM
RE: Metox &amp; Naxos Barry Williams 08/30/2001 11:39AM
RE: Metox &amp; Naxos Steve Cooper 08/29/2001 05:28PM
The HF war at sea SuperKraut 08/30/2001 10:16AM
RE: Metox vrs FuMB Antonio Veiga 08/25/2001 09:24PM
RE: Metox vrs FuMB Nicolo 08/26/2001 06:45AM
Thank-you and one more Peter 08/26/2001 10:00AM
RE: Thank-you and one more oliver 08/26/2001 10:26AM
RE: Thank-you and one more Erik E 08/26/2001 11:11AM
RE: Thank-you and one more Peter 08/26/2001 12:28PM
RE: Thank-you and one more Antonio Veiga 08/26/2001 06:32PM
RE: Thank-you and one more Peter 08/27/2001 05:02AM
RE: Snowflake and more Antonio Veiga 08/27/2001 06:04PM
RE: Thank-you and one more Peter 08/26/2001 12:42PM
RE: Thank-you and one more oliver 08/26/2001 06:35PM


Your Name: 
Your Email: 
Subject: 
Spam prevention:
Please, enter the code that you see below in the input field. This is for blocking bots that try to post this form automatically.
 **     **   *******    *******   **     **  **     ** 
 ***   ***  **     **  **     **  **     **   **   **  
 **** ****         **  **         **     **    ** **   
 ** *** **   *******   ********   *********     ***    
 **     **         **  **     **  **     **    ** **   
 **     **  **     **  **     **  **     **   **   **  
 **     **   *******    *******   **     **  **     **