Technology and Operations  
This forum is for discussing technological & operational matters pertaining to U-boats. 
Re: Fido(s)
Posted by: ROBERT M. ()
Date: October 27, 2002 09:06PM

WALTER M:

"U.S. BEWARE"

Following excerpt is from the prologue of "CRUSH DEPTH" by Joe Buff, published
October, 2002:

"In mid 2011, Boer-led reactionaries siezed control in South Africa in the midst of social chaos and restored apartheid. In response to a U.N. trade embargo, the
Boer regime began sinking U.S. and British merchant ships. Coalition forces mobilized, with only Germany holding back. Troops and tanks drained from the
rest of Europe and North America, and a joint task force set sail for Africa--into a
giant, coordinated trap.

There was another coup, in Berlin, and Kaiser Wilhelm's great-grandson was crowned. Ultranationalists, exploiting American unpreparedness for all-out war,
would give Germany her "place in the sun" at last. A secret military-industrial
conspiracy had planned it all for years, brutal opportunists who hated the mediocre
silliness of the European Union as much as they resented America's smug self-infatuation. The kaiser was their figurehead, to legitimize the New Order.
Coercion by the noose won over citizens not swayed by patriotism or the sheer onrush of events.

The Berlin-Boer Axis had covertly built small tactical atomic weapons, the great equalizers in what would otherwise have been a most uneven fight--and once again
America's CIA was clueless. The Axis used the these low-yield A-bombs to ambush the Allied naval task force underway, then destroyed Warsaw and Tripoli.
France surrendered at once, and Continental Europe was overrun. Germany won a strong beachhead in North Africa, while the South African army drove hard toward
them to link up.

Germany grabbed nuclear subs from the French. and advanced diesel submarines from other countries. Some were shared with the Boers. A financially supine
Russia. supposedly neutral yet long a believer in the practicality of limited tactical
nuclear war, sold weapons to the Axis for hard cash. Most of the rest of the world
stayed on the sidelines, biding their time out of fear or greed or both.

American supply convoys to starving Great Britain are being decimated by the modern U-boat threat, in another bloody Battle of the Atlantic. Tens of thousands
of merchant seamen died in the Second World War, and the casualty lists grow very long this time too.

America herself depends both militarily and economically on vulnerable shipping lanes across the vast Pacific Ocean, to neutral Asia and the Persian Gulff. If these
shipping lanes are cut, the U.S. will have no choice but to recognize Axis gains and
sue for an armistice: an Axis victory! America and Great Britian each own one state-of-the-art ceramic-hulled fast attack sub--such as USS CHALLENGER,
capable of tremendous depths--but Germany and South Africa own such vessels too.

Now, in February 2012, high summer in the Southern Hemisphere, the U.S. is on the defensive everywhere, and democracy has never been more threatened, In this terrible new war, with the mid-ocean's surface a killing zone, America's last, best hope for enduring freedom rests with a special breed of fearless undersea warriors ."

This 464-page paperback is available from amazon.com for $9.95 + $3.49 S&H.....

Later,

ROBERT M.

Options: ReplyQuote


Subject Written By Posted
Fido(s) walter M 10/21/2002 09:48PM
Re: Fido(s) Rainer Bruns 10/22/2002 01:38AM
Re: Fido(s) walter M 10/22/2002 11:02AM
Re: Fido(s) Peter 10/22/2002 04:09PM
Re: Fido(s) walter M 10/23/2002 10:47AM
Re: Fido(s) MCE 10/23/2002 04:42PM
Re: Fido(s) walter M 10/23/2002 05:49PM
Re: Fido(s) MCE 10/24/2002 04:30PM
faster fidos and tired XXI's kurt 10/25/2002 01:01PM
Re: faster fidos and tired XXI's Rainer Bruns 10/25/2002 02:08PM
Ranier: fido speed kurt 10/25/2002 05:41PM
Re: Ranier: fido speed Rainer Bruns 10/25/2002 06:34PM
Re: Ranier: fido speed kurt 10/25/2002 07:48PM
Re: Fido(s) Rainer Bruns 10/23/2002 06:02PM
Re: Fido(s) MCE 10/24/2002 04:26PM
Re: Fido(s) Sander Kingsepp 11/06/2002 08:24AM
Re: Fido(s) Peter 10/23/2002 06:23PM
Re: Fido(s) Bram 10/23/2002 07:39PM
Re: Fido(s) ROBERT M. 10/27/2002 03:11AM
Re: Fido(s) Rainer Bruns 10/22/2002 05:44PM
Re: Fido(s) walter M 10/23/2002 06:00PM
Re: Fido(s) ROBERT M. 10/27/2002 09:06PM
Re: Ranier: fido speed Don 10/26/2002 12:46PM
Re: Ranier: fido speed MCE 10/26/2002 02:12PM
Re: Ranier: fido speed Rainer Bruns 10/26/2002 02:58PM
Re: Fido(s) Patrick Meagher 10/26/2002 05:08PM
Re: Fido(s) walter M 10/26/2002 07:34PM
Re: Fido(s) Patrick Meagher 10/26/2002 10:08PM
Re: Fido(s) Sniper 10/27/2002 09:59AM
Re: Fido(s) ROBERT M. 10/27/2002 02:04PM
Re: Fido(s) Patrick Meagher 10/27/2002 05:11PM
Re: Fido(s) ROBERT M. 10/27/2002 09:32PM
Re: Fido(s) Patrick Meagher 10/28/2002 07:03PM
Re: Fido(s) Patrick Meagher 10/27/2002 04:23PM
Re: Fido(s) ROBERT M. 10/27/2002 03:33AM
Re: Fido(s) Patrick Meagher 10/27/2002 03:39AM
Re: Fido(s) ROBERT M. 10/27/2002 02:32PM
Re: Fido(s) Patrick Meagher 10/27/2002 04:45PM
Good Allied Doctrine Mark K 11/02/2002 10:17PM
Re: Good Allied Doctrine ROBERT M. 11/03/2002 02:42AM
"mine" vice "torpedo" Mark 11/03/2002 09:08AM
Re: "mine" vice "torpedo" ROBERT M. 11/03/2002 02:27PM
Re: "mine" vice "torpedo" Sniper 11/03/2002 04:05PM
I think we agree then: Mark 11/03/2002 11:02PM
Re: I think we agree then: ROBERT M. 11/04/2002 04:26AM
Re: Good Allied Doctrine ROBERT M. 11/03/2002 03:26AM
Re: Good Allied Doctrine Sander Kingsepp 11/06/2002 08:15AM


Your Name: 
Your Email: 
Subject: 
Spam prevention:
Please, enter the code that you see below in the input field. This is for blocking bots that try to post this form automatically.
  ******    ********   ********   **    **  **      ** 
 **    **   **     **  **     **   **  **   **  **  ** 
 **         **     **  **     **    ****    **  **  ** 
 **   ****  ********   ********      **     **  **  ** 
 **    **   **         **            **     **  **  ** 
 **    **   **         **            **     **  **  ** 
  ******    **         **            **      ***  ***