Technology and Operations  
This forum is for discussing technological & operational matters pertaining to U-boats. 
Re: Fido(s)
Posted by: Patrick Meagher ()
Date: October 28, 2002 07:03PM

Yep, I know the tacky wax drill. Also remember lapping exhaust valves in the steam torpedo shop at Pearl. When I was on Barbel we no longer did the tacky wax thing. MK 16-8's were really tight and the O-rings on the exhaust valves held up well. Only shot a couple of MK 14-5's during those years. Only did it so my junior TM's could get that wonderful experience. No tacky wax on them either.

Did you ever recover a MK 14 at sea and post-run in the Torpedo Room? I did it one time on Cusk. What a goat-rope! The king post and boom were rusted into their mounting location in the superstructure. Our Chief Torpedoman was the only person on board who had ever recovered at sea before so he taught everyone. He had us rig up a tail line with a length of chain on the end. The end of the chain had a big metal loop on it so you could run the chain through the loop and create a noose. The idea was after you snagged the exercise head with a nose line you would pass the tail line over it and let the weight of the chain carry it down to the tail cone. while your doing this, your passing the hoisting strap over the nose line also. Got a guy in the water pushing the hoisting strap down the air flask, bow planes rigged out with a guy with the boat hook on it, the Chief is yelling directions, the Gun Boss is yelling at the Chief, and the XO is a self appointed safety observer with a whistle. There was a very small sea running and when we would get a surge the torpedo would bang against the tank top, or start surging up and down. What a cluster ****. It all kinda worked and we got the torpedo back aboard. The forward room didn't want to post run it but the Chief made-em do it. They made sure the Wardroom heard about it. AAHHH for the life on a Fleet Snorkel. There were advantages to being in the trailer.

Options: ReplyQuote


Subject Written By Posted
Fido(s) walter M 10/21/2002 09:48PM
Re: Fido(s) Rainer Bruns 10/22/2002 01:38AM
Re: Fido(s) walter M 10/22/2002 11:02AM
Re: Fido(s) Peter 10/22/2002 04:09PM
Re: Fido(s) walter M 10/23/2002 10:47AM
Re: Fido(s) MCE 10/23/2002 04:42PM
Re: Fido(s) walter M 10/23/2002 05:49PM
Re: Fido(s) MCE 10/24/2002 04:30PM
faster fidos and tired XXI's kurt 10/25/2002 01:01PM
Re: faster fidos and tired XXI's Rainer Bruns 10/25/2002 02:08PM
Ranier: fido speed kurt 10/25/2002 05:41PM
Re: Ranier: fido speed Rainer Bruns 10/25/2002 06:34PM
Re: Ranier: fido speed kurt 10/25/2002 07:48PM
Re: Fido(s) Rainer Bruns 10/23/2002 06:02PM
Re: Fido(s) MCE 10/24/2002 04:26PM
Re: Fido(s) Sander Kingsepp 11/06/2002 08:24AM
Re: Fido(s) Peter 10/23/2002 06:23PM
Re: Fido(s) Bram 10/23/2002 07:39PM
Re: Fido(s) ROBERT M. 10/27/2002 03:11AM
Re: Fido(s) Rainer Bruns 10/22/2002 05:44PM
Re: Fido(s) walter M 10/23/2002 06:00PM
Re: Fido(s) ROBERT M. 10/27/2002 09:06PM
Re: Ranier: fido speed Don 10/26/2002 12:46PM
Re: Ranier: fido speed MCE 10/26/2002 02:12PM
Re: Ranier: fido speed Rainer Bruns 10/26/2002 02:58PM
Re: Fido(s) Patrick Meagher 10/26/2002 05:08PM
Re: Fido(s) walter M 10/26/2002 07:34PM
Re: Fido(s) Patrick Meagher 10/26/2002 10:08PM
Re: Fido(s) Sniper 10/27/2002 09:59AM
Re: Fido(s) ROBERT M. 10/27/2002 02:04PM
Re: Fido(s) Patrick Meagher 10/27/2002 05:11PM
Re: Fido(s) ROBERT M. 10/27/2002 09:32PM
Re: Fido(s) Patrick Meagher 10/28/2002 07:03PM
Re: Fido(s) Patrick Meagher 10/27/2002 04:23PM
Re: Fido(s) ROBERT M. 10/27/2002 03:33AM
Re: Fido(s) Patrick Meagher 10/27/2002 03:39AM
Re: Fido(s) ROBERT M. 10/27/2002 02:32PM
Re: Fido(s) Patrick Meagher 10/27/2002 04:45PM
Good Allied Doctrine Mark K 11/02/2002 10:17PM
Re: Good Allied Doctrine ROBERT M. 11/03/2002 02:42AM
"mine" vice "torpedo" Mark 11/03/2002 09:08AM
Re: "mine" vice "torpedo" ROBERT M. 11/03/2002 02:27PM
Re: "mine" vice "torpedo" Sniper 11/03/2002 04:05PM
I think we agree then: Mark 11/03/2002 11:02PM
Re: I think we agree then: ROBERT M. 11/04/2002 04:26AM
Re: Good Allied Doctrine ROBERT M. 11/03/2002 03:26AM
Re: Good Allied Doctrine Sander Kingsepp 11/06/2002 08:15AM


Your Name: 
Your Email: 
Subject: 
Spam prevention:
Please, enter the code that you see below in the input field. This is for blocking bots that try to post this form automatically.
 **      **  ********  **     **  **     **  **     ** 
 **  **  **  **        **     **  **     **  **     ** 
 **  **  **  **        **     **  **     **  **     ** 
 **  **  **  ******    **     **  **     **  ********* 
 **  **  **  **         **   **    **   **   **     ** 
 **  **  **  **          ** **      ** **    **     ** 
  ***  ***   ********     ***        ***     **     **